Three year window means we must spend in FA

Messages
6,246
Reaction score
9,276
We have Dak on a rookie contract for three more years. We have Zeke on a rookie contract for four more years. Much like the Seahawks did when they had Wilson on a rookie contract, we need to spend big now before we have to resign Dak and Zeke. This is our window where we have two legit league MVP candidates who are going to command huge dollars when their rookie deals expire. We will not get another window like this. And with the long-term Romo money off the books, there simply is NO EXCUSE for not spending big at DE and CB with front-loaded three year deals. I know Stephen has said they will not be big spenders, but if they cannot see this limited golden opportunity, the FO is really foolish. Drafting a rookie DE or CB at the bottom of the round who will take three years to develop into an impact player (or never, see Byron Jones) is not the answer. Find a proven blue chip DE (JPP, Jabaal Sheard, Melvin Ingram) and CB (Trumaine Johnson, AJ Bouye, Stephan Gillmore) and make the move this year! Signed, we the fans who have suffered too long with the league's worst 3rd down defense.
 

Proximo

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
9,117
"Spending big" is great in theory, especially when you have the resources. The problem is, you don't always get what you paid for.

There are no return policies on FA busts. We need to spend big only if we truly believe that the player is going to be that difference maker that we need.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
"Spending big" is great in theory, especially when you have the resources. The problem is, you don't always get what you paid for.

There are no return policies on FA busts. We need to spend big only if we truly believe that the player is going to be that difference maker that we need.

No doubt. But the same can be said for resigning your own guys. A lot of them aren't worth the second contracts they receive. I prefer building through the draft, but if you need to fill a hole, get the best veteran you can afford, either internally or externally.
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
20,855
Spend what, you mean on a blue chip guy like Hardy, how'd that work out!! the Cowboys are already over the cap.......and you have Romo who if you trade, eats up 20 million against your cap and Martin is due to get a huge contract, so this notion Dallas should just go out and spend is ridiculous..
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,665
Reaction score
86,206
We still have Romos contract and if we cut him we don't save very much and that money will probably go to another backup QB.


IMO.. Trade Romo or keep him.
 
Messages
6,246
Reaction score
9,276
"Spending big" is great in theory, especially when you have the resources. The problem is, you don't always get what you paid for.

There are no return policies on FA busts. We need to spend big only if we truly believe that the player is going to be that difference maker that we need.
But if we spend during the three year window, and front load, a FA bust will not hurt us long term. You MUST take a chance at this point. This is how Denver and Seattle won super bowls
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
We still have Romos contract and if we cut him we don't save very much and that money will probably go to another backup QB.


IMO.. Trade Romo or keep him.

While it makes sense. Romo will not want to be a backup.
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
The window is bigger than 3 years!

Not if you restructure deals in order to make a FA splash, which is what Dallas have to do given their current cap situation. That's why I think the smarter play is to build with another draft or two, plus add Jaylon -- NOT through buying a D-Line and secondary through FA.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,232
Reaction score
16,874
It is fine to say we have to spend in FA, but on who? What CB or DE is out there that will be worth over paying for?

Spending just to spend isn't an answer either.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
We have Dak on a rookie contract for three more years. We have Zeke on a rookie contract for four more years. Much like the Seahawks did when they had Wilson on a rookie contract, we need to spend big now before we have to resign Dak and Zeke. This is our window where we have two legit league MVP candidates who are going to command huge dollars when their rookie deals expire. We will not get another window like this. And with the long-term Romo money off the books, there simply is NO EXCUSE for not spending big at DE and CB with front-loaded three year deals. I know Stephen has said they will not be big spenders, but if they cannot see this limited golden opportunity, the FO is really foolish. Drafting a rookie DE or CB at the bottom of the round who will take three years to develop into an impact player (or never, see Byron Jones) is not the answer. Find a proven blue chip DE (JPP, Jabaal Sheard, Melvin Ingram) and CB (Trumaine Johnson, AJ Bouye, Stephan Gillmore) and make the move this year! Signed, we the fans who have suffered too long with the league's worst 3rd down defense.
I predict that our biggest expenditure will be extending the best Offensive Guard in the league--our own Zack Martin.
Money well spent.
 

willia451

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,288
Reaction score
3,528
So we're cutting Tony Romo? And taking on that dead money for two years? Ok.

But then. Who is going to be the backup QB? Sanchez? Somebody worse?

And the FA market is a crap shoot, too. That's where folks like Carr and Hardy came from.

Not saying don't do any of that. But be careful what you wish for. No guarantee it will work out.

IMO. Keep Romo if you can and build through the draft. Defense next, please.
 
Top