playmakers
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,238
- Reaction score
- 154
First, let me say, Im like Sweden when it comes to Mcfadden, Im open either way. Im neutral. With that being said I think theres only one trade partner that makes sense.
If a deal should go down the only team it would go through, imo, is the Chiefs. For starters, they have been trade partners before and think highley of each other.(Jones and Peterson) Secondly, other teams around the top 5 have nothing in common with the Cowboys. In common, I mean, have the pieces in place for both parties to be happy in a trade. So, why the Chiefs?
The Chiefs are rebuilding and just traded away their best defensive player. There in no shape to win a Superbowl next year. With this draft having a weak top 10 but a strong back 20, why would they want to pay a player money thats really not much better than a player picked say 17th. I seen many mocks having them take Brandon Albert( I think thats his name) the Olineman from Virginia. Albert, is rated by many scouts between 15-20 best player. They might be able to grab him at 17 or 21 and save some space and add some picks.
Now, since the Chiefs are rebuilding what would be the most intelligent way to go? You can pick at 5,17 and 35? Or, at 17, 21, 28 and 35? If your the Chiefs I think you do this hands down. You can get a Cromartie at 17, Devin Thomas at 21 and Quetion Groves or Phillip Merling at 28. Those are some nice building blocks. Then at 35 in the second round you can add a Gosder Cherlieus, Dan Conner etc if they fall. Someone will fall in their laps in the begining of the second round, they always do. We got Gurode etc etc. Thats not bad for a rebuilding team and makes alot of sense imo for them. The final trade would probably look like 21-28 and Spears[because they just lost Allen, they need a reliable, veteran body) for the 5?
Whats you guys take on this.
If a deal should go down the only team it would go through, imo, is the Chiefs. For starters, they have been trade partners before and think highley of each other.(Jones and Peterson) Secondly, other teams around the top 5 have nothing in common with the Cowboys. In common, I mean, have the pieces in place for both parties to be happy in a trade. So, why the Chiefs?
The Chiefs are rebuilding and just traded away their best defensive player. There in no shape to win a Superbowl next year. With this draft having a weak top 10 but a strong back 20, why would they want to pay a player money thats really not much better than a player picked say 17th. I seen many mocks having them take Brandon Albert( I think thats his name) the Olineman from Virginia. Albert, is rated by many scouts between 15-20 best player. They might be able to grab him at 17 or 21 and save some space and add some picks.
Now, since the Chiefs are rebuilding what would be the most intelligent way to go? You can pick at 5,17 and 35? Or, at 17, 21, 28 and 35? If your the Chiefs I think you do this hands down. You can get a Cromartie at 17, Devin Thomas at 21 and Quetion Groves or Phillip Merling at 28. Those are some nice building blocks. Then at 35 in the second round you can add a Gosder Cherlieus, Dan Conner etc if they fall. Someone will fall in their laps in the begining of the second round, they always do. We got Gurode etc etc. Thats not bad for a rebuilding team and makes alot of sense imo for them. The final trade would probably look like 21-28 and Spears[because they just lost Allen, they need a reliable, veteran body) for the 5?
Whats you guys take on this.
