TO interfered with on 2 pt conversion n/m *Merge*

QT

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
855
I thought he was too. The corner didn't even look back. But who cares when you have NICK FOLK!!!
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
He was interfered with. The DB pushed TO in the chest before the ball was there then raked TO's arm. Romo under threw it AGAIN!
 

Wimbo

Active Member
Messages
4,133
Reaction score
3
I agree. But, it turned out to be a good thing. Winning outright is better than OT in an Away game.

Refs were trying hard for Buffalo tonight. Lots of really bad calls.
 

TX_Yid

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,439
Reaction score
1,579
Shocking officiating. Losing count of the number of times McBriar is hit after his punts.

The pass interference was blatant. No excuse for the officials on that call.
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
OT would have been MUCH better. I have Romo, Witten and JJ on my fantasy team and I friggin lost by 0.15 points. Damn TO dropped that 22 yarder that was over turned. He dropped the endzone 2 pointer. Come on man!
 

JerryFan

Active Member
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
7
DanTanna;1694283 said:
He was interfered with. The DB pushed TO in the chest before the ball was there then raked TO's arm. Romo under threw it AGAIN!

I agree with everything other then Romo underthrew the ball. I think that was actually where he wanted to put that ball.
 

TheGoat73

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
1,513
TX_Yid;1694338 said:
Losing count of the number of times McBriar is hit after his punts.

Yeah, this is troubling too. Did a rule change this offseason or something?
 

Mr Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,612
Reaction score
32,654
TO should have caught the balls with his hands instead of letting it come into his body.....................
 

gqlawyer1970

New Member
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Obviously Romo didn't have a good game, and I would agree that the ball could have been placed better, but that was one of his better throws of the night. TO still almost had the ball despite a blatant push off. How did they miss that? He never even turned to play the ball. That alone usually draws a flag. It did seem that the Cowboys were not getting many calls tonight.

-Gene
 

ChrisCanty99

New Member
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
The best part of it all is that the BSPNers who were openly rooting against the Cowboys (not really for the Bills, as Berman was) are deprived of showing the replays incessantly all week.

This week on ESPN Sportscenter, they'll replay three day old baseball games so they don't have to show the MNF highlights...
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,225
Reaction score
16,868
JerryFan;1694361 said:
I agree with everything other then Romo underthrew the ball. I think that was actually where he wanted to put that ball.

Totally disagree that ball needs to be thrown deeper so the db cant make a play on it. I hate the play call Romo has struggled big time on those type of passes. Plus there was no threat of the run without Barber in the backfield.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
I have no clue about the interference, but I do know that TO is not clutch. He's an outstanding athlete, but when it's crunch time, he doesn't come through.

After that drop by TO on the play that would've gotten us a closer field goal, Romo did not go to him to put us in range again, using Barber and I think Crayton. Too bad Crayton doesn't have Romo speed.
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,323
Reaction score
20,092
The interference was blatant. But then again, the advantage on PI on the 2 point conversion goes to the defence. What is the penalty? They move the ball 1.5 yards closer and they get another shot at a 50 percent play? Its not like interference in the end zone from scrimmage, where there is the automatic first down. I guess the defence has the advantage on all penalties that are automatic 1st downs from scrimmage on the 2 pt conversion. Seems a little skewed to me, not to mention the time out right before the ball is snapped on the last second FG attempt. Didn't Buffalo have 2 time outs left? Why didn't they do it 2 more times? Is that illegal?
 

kevwun

New Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
0
First, I didn't really like that call. Fades are a low percentage play in my mind, not something you want to run in that situation. Also, they are thrown immediately and don't let things develop. Secondly, it was blatant pass interference. The corner back face guarded TO, which is illegal. He also made contact before the ball got there. He was clearly not playing the ball because he couldn't see it.
 

links18

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,323
Reaction score
20,092
gqlawyer1970;1694395 said:
Obviously Romo didn't have a good game, and I would agree that the ball could have been placed better, but that was one of his better throws of the night. TO still almost had the ball despite a blatant push off. How did they miss that? He never even turned to play the ball. That alone usually draws a flag. It did seem that the Cowboys were not getting many calls tonight.

-Gene

What happended to the "face guarding" call on that play? Haven't we had that called against us like 10 times in the past couple of years?
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,950
Reaction score
23,099
From last year in discussions it was said that face guarding is legal now, but on that play the db actually was grabbing TO arms to make sure he couldn't catch it.
 

kevwun

New Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
0
I'll add some other beefs. I thought the TO catch that ruled incomplete could have been considered a catch because of a force out. TO's second foot came down 4 or 5 inches out of bounds. I think he would have brought it down without the contact. The spiking call was also BS. He's never going to get the benefit of the doubt on stuff like this and it's his own doing. It still isn't right.
 
Top