juckie;1297273 said:now!He is the hole in the secondary ,and it is quite obvious for years now.Being a pro bowler we would get a nice exchange for him.He is bad in the 3-4,just horrible.Either that or go back to 4-3.or 4-6.
juckie;1297273 said:now!He is the hole in the secondary ,and it is quite obvious for years now.Being a pro bowler we would get a nice exchange for him.He is bad in the 3-4,just horrible.Either that or go back to 4-3.or 4-6.
juckie;1297273 said:now!He is the hole in the secondary ,and it is quite obvious for years now.Being a pro bowler we would get a nice exchange for him.He is bad in the 3-4,just horrible.Either that or go back to 4-3.or 4-6.
dstew60105;1297309 said:The 3-4 has really nothing to do with Roy. The 3-4 is really only the front 7. It's not his fault we can't rush the passer. Does he have problems is coverage? Yes. Can a decent DC hide some of those problems? Yes.
I thought we had decent pressure last night.superpunk;1297311 said:
Decent pressure never hurt any secondary.
Guess we should trade Newman, too.
DMOB;1297316 said:Whats the difference with him in the 3-4 or 4-3, cause of pressure? Doesn't matter he's a liability.
We played at 8 o'clock, and don't have horseshoes on our helmets. Hasselbeck rarely got touched.juckie;1297317 said:I thought we had decent pressure last night.
juckie;1297317 said:I thought we had decent pressure last night.
DMOB;1297316 said:Whats the difference with him in the 3-4 or 4-3, cause of pressure? Doesn't matter he's a liability.
aardvark;1297382 said:Trade Roy Williams SS for Roy Williams WR... ducking:
Sarge;1297434 said:Roy is a good player - he also happens to be the most overrated player on the team. He's good, he's just not what everyone thought he was going to be...............by a longshot.