Trade with SF.

[Yuma Cactus]

If SF would be interested in Tavon or someone else at 18. Trade them 18 & 80 for 31 & 34. Select Cyprian, Short and Warford with 31, 34 and 47.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

It's a very interesting premise and I've been playing around with the idea. Hypothetically, we could use 34 or 47 to trade back and get back a third.

 

[XxTDxX]

I really don't see us drafting Warford.. Not the type of lineman they are looking for.. too slow footed

 

[32BellyOption]

If SF would be interested in Tavon or someone else at 18. Trade them 18 & 80 for 31 & 34. Select Cyprian, Short and Warford with 31, 34 and 47.

Not sure I'd want to hand deliver the most dynamic play maker in the draft to the defending NFC Champs.

 

[Yuma Cactus]

The draft is to improve your team. All 32 are trying to do the same. IMO getting 3 potential starters is improving the 'Boys.

 

[kirkjrk]

If SF would be interested in Tavon or someone else at 18. Trade them 18 & 80 for 31 & 34. Select Cyprian, Short and Warford with 31, 34 and 47.

Or, if Spencer doesn't extend and knowing SF needs to get rid of some of their picks, then the following.

18 & 47 + Spencer

For

31,34,61,74 That means we would get equal to a 2nd toward the back of the round, for Spencer. I believe T. Austin or Vaccaro would have to be available for SF to possibly be interested. We would have 5 picks between 31 and 80. Many good players available in that span. Talk them into it Jerry. I think one of SF DEs is 34 and in last year of contract.

 

[Oh_Canada]

Or, if Spencer doesn't extend and knowing SF needs to get rid of some of their picks, then the following.

18 & 47 + Spencer

For

31,34,61,74 That means we would get equal to a 2nd toward the back of the round, for Spencer. I believe T. Austin or Vaccaro would have to be available for SF to possibly be interested. We would have 5 picks between 31 and 80. Many good players available in that span. Talk them into it Jerry. I think one of SF DEs is 34 and in last year of contract.

That doesn't make much sense to me. Drop thirteen spots in the first rd, plus give up the team's second best pass rusher for 61 and 74?

 

[rockj7]

That doesn't make much sense to me. Drop thirteen spots in the first rd, plus give up the team's second best pass rusher for 61 and 74?

:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:

Now I know we may do something like this because (key phrase) That doesn't make much sense