Troy Aikman vs Ryan Fitzpatrick

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,474
Reaction score
20,154
I am critical of Troy as a player and think he gets far more credit than he deserves, however, he put together 5 good/great seasons. Fitzpatrick has always flirted with becoming a great QB where he'll have a couple of great weeks and then look like one of the worst QBs in the league.

2011 bills he led them to 5-0 and then they went on to win like or or two games after that. 2015 Jets, he had them in the playoff mix just to lose to a team that wasn't in the playoff mix.

I'm rooting for Fitzpatrick, he seems like a really good dude and it would be a great story line if he makes the Bucs relevant for a season. But let's pump the breaks, Fitzmagic could go to Fitztragic quickly.
 

DuncanIso

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,453
Reaction score
6,000
Aikman really started to decline in 96. I think his worst playoff game was the 98 playoff loss to the Cards. He had 3 INTs and a 36 QBR. Terrible.

I like Troy, but we really struggled with him in the 2nd half of his career. We just couldn't score.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,474
Reaction score
20,154
Aikman really started to decline in 96. I think his worst playoff game was the 98 playoff loss to the Cards. He had 3 INTs and a 36 QBR. Terrible.

I like Troy, but we really struggled with him in the 2nd half of his career. We just couldn't score.

Yeah, people tend to forget, Troy had some seriously terrible playoff games in the second half of his career. Even some we won.

As much as Troy puts the fault on the coaching staff, he just never became a guy who could carry a team. The second half of his career is why he drops down my list of "all-time greats".
 

Trouty

Kellen Moore baby
Messages
31,526
Reaction score
80,467
You don’t win three Super Bowls as a QB if you aren’t elite. After his third SB, and fourth consecutive deep run into the playoffs, it was sealed. If Romo’s legacy was destroyed by an inept front office fielding ill-constructed teams, bad coaching, and injuries, so then, was the latter part of Aikman’s career. Unlike Romo, Troy had a hell of a trophy case and list of accomplishments to fall back on once he started to decline.

Favre, Young, Marino, Aikman, Elway. Then Kelly. Kelly didn’t win, and he didn’t win in spectacular fashion. And he didn’t have the otherworldly stats that Marino did to warrant him in the top 5 of the early-mid 90s greats. Elway, if you go look, had pretty pedestrian numbers and accomplishments until he got TD. Hello, era-adjustment detractors.

If you’re a top-5 QB for any extended amount of time in a QB-rich era, you’re elite in my book. A top-5 QB is earned, through time and results. It’s never just given.

And what is “elite?” Is it TD:Int? Y/A? Yards? Comp %? Wins? Rings? A winner’s leadership? 6 straight Pro Bowls? Super Bowl MVP? Do we adjust stats for era, or is that not allowed when it goes against an argument? Some of these things Troy wasn’t, others he was. No question he was elite, and I won’t even entertain the absurdity of the question posed or implied in the OP.

/rant
 
Last edited:

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
If my ultra TB fan Christian's euphoria earlier in the year became true, and Fitzpatrick went on to pass for 6,000 yards, then maybe this conversation could be had on some levels - as a what if Fitzpatrick played during Aikman's era.

With him being benched again, he is what he is, a journeyman QB, sadly too old to truly ever change that.
 
Top