Yeah, well I think you're just a ****. You just invented an argument and are now insisting with all your might that I am your opponent in this argument and the only reason I can think of to do so is that you're a troll who likes to argue.
Therefore I yield, you win. Something tells me if I looked through your 30k post history I wouldn't find a track record of someone defending politeness and cordial behavior and serving as a vanguard of truth and debate. I think I'd find a long list of people who wish they'd just stopped responding to you and indulging you.
I still have no idea what Henny King is apparently helping me argue with you about.
You even admitted not knowing the poster I was replying to. I knew whom he was, yet you chided in with “he could be part of the new group that arrived and
does know the narrative.” Then you backtrack when you say that you know Crawford gets hate and I point out
that the poster I was replying to said he “doesn’t get hate”
Then neezy says I’m coming at you. I wasn’t. I was adding more context to help you underatand. So that you don’t feel like new members are being targeted for their join date, just being given context on the forum’s own narrative that predates Nov 2017.
See, I didn’t want to have to spend 10 posts detailing this out for you. I reckon, if you re-read my original post that triggered you, you might see it differently now.
Yes, if you went through my posts, you would see I’m very fair. Until I’m attacked or, in your case, my posts are picked apart so that you can get a pat on the head for pointing at some pretend meanie.
Could you and I maybe take this to an OT thread if you want to continue? I feel bad for the OP that you two have done this to his thread. I can’t NOT reply, either, so I’m just as complicit