Unpopular Football Opinions That You Have

[RS12]

we will not win big with Ratliff at NT

could not have said it better:starspin

 

[jday]

You're new sig is flawed and needs to be fixed. Badly. :laugh2:

How's this?

 

[YosemiteSam]

How's this?

I think every person should have my name in their .sig. Good job! :laugh2:

 

[OAM]

No, I'd say delusional is pretty much defined by your opinion that calls in NFL games are directly influenced by the betting public and/or private gambling entities. I find that flat out humorous.

You say "calls" generally. I indicated "certain calls". Your lack of detail is humorous. The way you act like you have never heard someone say this before is humorous, sheep. Your methods of communication are aggressive, tunnel visioned and obviously outplayed. I can easly do it too and better. Use integrity and an open mind and you'll get a constructive response rather than a dominating one. Say thank you for the education.

 

[Rampage]

You say "calls" generally. I indicated "certain calls". Your lack of detail is humorous. The way you act like you have never heard someone say this before is humorous, sheep.

Steelers vs Seahawks

 

[jday]

I think every person should have my name in their .sig. Good job! :laugh2:

That's weird...I had an emoticon pissing on NYC. Oh well...

 

[OAM]

Seriously?

Do you think its a common occurrence?

Sunday to Sunday. Monday to Monday. The odd Thursday to odd Thursday. Watch the numbers and see where the majority money lies. The opposite or push (break even and collect juice point) always occur. Okay, well over 80% of the time. No use in arguing folks, check the numbers. If I'm wrong I'm wrong. You'll find historically I'm not.

An "employee" acting like one of us will come out and make an opinion, but with nothing to back their so called opinion up. Like I said, check the numbers like the profiteers do and you'll recognize the facts. I'm just some "ill informed" blogger/diehard football fan.

 

[OAM]

No, I'd say delusional is pretty much defined by your opinion that calls in NFL games are directly influenced by the betting public and/or private gambling entities. I find that flat out humorous.

What's even more conspicuous than funny. You totally outright and defined the "gambling entity" which is what i (with a small "i") called it, as the "betting public and/or private gambling entities". As opposed to my simple generalization previously mentioned. Boy, you have to split it up into categories almost like a gambling profiteer would. Ok, I'll categorize you and split you up too. Propaganda employee/marketeer. Don't give opinions as responses, but give factually backed responses.

Miserable, antagonist, propaganda/ marketer at its best, which is weaker than the integral worst. Go find a push over employee/sheep other than "i"/"we". Where's your facts proving otherwise? Beg me to show the facts proving so. I will. You're not pushing me over employee. Let these Dallas Cowboys Fans have an integral opinion without aggressive circumstance. No brainwash of what the corporate mass' want.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Philip Rivers is a top 5 QB. He just goes out there and tears up defenses. No LT? No problem.

Eli Manning sucks balls at QB. His defense made an 18-0 unstoppable Pats team look below average. He will look awful this year.

Carson Palmer is overrated

Big Ben is highly overrated

 

[OAM]

Philip Rivers is a top 5 QB. He just goes out there and tears up defenses. No LT? No problem.

Eli Manning sucks balls at QB. His defense made an 18-0 unstoppable Pats team look below average. He will look awful this year.

Carson Palmer is overrated

Big Ben is highly overrated

Is Lebron a Texas boy?

 

[OAM]

Steelers vs Seahawks

That's an extremely good overall game example. Even last years Steelers final and season games leading up to it. 2 SB's that I've seen with my own eyes that have questions. Man when we won our SB's in the 90's there were no questions. We blew folks up. We might have been the greatest dynasty ever then.

But if people have questions, we were certainly primed to be the greatest. The San Fran game in the semi's and Jerry/Jimmy pulling their ego out was just striking. Even Switzer won with that team. Switzer. In 4 seasons we won 3 SB's and lossed in the semi's to the champs who we came back on and should have beat. Tell me any other better 4 year span in football? Even the cap era Patriots can't contend.

 

[Hostile]

Here's where I think you're wrong:

Yes, steady production is always better than Boom-or-bust styles. But Sanders wasn't just a boom-or-bust runner, he was the greatest boom-and-bust runners in the history of the NFL. He had more "booms" than anyone else ever had.

Also, yea people are wrong when they say his offense/offensive line sucked. But they also weren't as great as you're making it out to be. And certainly not as great as Smith's teammates.

So no, Sanders is not the best RB of all time. But I don't see how he's not a top-10 RB, much less a negative for his team.

Here's a little clue for you. Very few O-lines have ever measured up to the early 90's Cowboys.

That said, Jimmy Johnson contended Emmitt made those guys great more than they made him great.

Tuinei was a college DT, came into the NFL in 1983 as an undrafted free agent back when it was 12 round drafts. He did not make the Pro Bowl until 1994 & 1995. Emmitt years.

Nate Newton was a USFL transfer who arrived in 1986. He did not make a Pro Bowl until 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, & 1999. Emmitt years.

Mark Stepnoski was a 3rd round pick in 1989. He made 2 Pro Bowls with the Titans. They are 2 of his 5 that are not Emmitt years. He did not make his first until 1992. So he wasn't a Pro Bowler until Emmitt arrived.

Kevin Gogan was an 8th round pick in 1987. He did not make a Pro Bowl until 1994 after he left the Cowboys.

He was replaced by Larry Allen. A 2nd round pick in 1994. IMO he should have had a 12th Pro Bowl appearance his rookie year over Gogan the guy he replaced.

Erik Williams was a 3rd round choice in 1991. He was a Pro Bowler 4 times starting in 1993 and then there was a gap to 1996. Still, Emmitt years.

The point is, none of these guys were 1st round picks and blue chippers. Emmitt made them as Jimmy said.

I do consider Barry a negative because of what I have said 3 times now.

2nd & long

3rd & long

He left this team stuck there too many times for them to succeed. Football is about consistency. That kind of situation leads to a lot of punts.

 

[Four]

Sunday to Sunday. Monday to Monday. The odd Thursday to odd Thursday. Watch the numbers and see where the majority money lies. The opposite or push (break even and collect juice point) always occur. Okay, well over 80% of the time. No use in arguing folks, check the numbers. If I'm wrong I'm wrong. You'll find historically I'm not.

An "employee" acting like one of us will come out and make an opinion, but with nothing to back their so called opinion up. Like I said, check the numbers like the profiteers do and you'll recognize the facts. I'm just some "ill informed" blogger/diehard football fan.

dude, if the gambling lines were wrong all the time then the people making the lines wouldn't get paid to do their jobs.

your conspiracy is little more than the people in the gambling world being really good at what they do.

 

[OAM]

dude, if the gambling lines were wrong all the time then the people making the lines wouldn't get paid to do their jobs.

your conspiracy is little more than the people in the gambling world being really good at what they do.

Who the hell ever said the gambling lines were wrong? The pro's set them up to make money and that's exactly what they do. You know, a handicapper? That's what the lines are, handicaps. The pro's handicap the bettors. Anyways, you're lost until I inform you in this regard.

Don't make pathetic statement responses that are hollow. Whatever you said there is uninformed and confrontational only for the sake of being so. Another sheep tamer who can't find anymore sheep to tame. Just another weak, uninformed, I get $12.00/hr to blog with sheep when I can't mascot, response.

The word conspiracy is rather aggressive when it is a belief I have posted through registering the numbers factually. People pay money for these stats just to get an idea of how to buck the trend. But then again you get $12.00/hr to blog and act like you're a simple fan blogging when you can't mascot.

You like strong, aggressive, implicating statements to strike fear in people who express ideas and truth? Well suck mine down too then rookie. You're out of your intellectual league when dealing with me. Keep it to loving da Boyz and you'll survive in this market. Don't try and push a real fan who see's the big picture and only wants us to achieve what we're destined to when being integral.

 

[Hostile]

That's weird...I had an emoticon pissing on NYC. Oh well...

Animated sigs and avatars aren't allowed. It was probably removed.

 

[Hostile]

Another of mine that is not popular. I was not happy when we signed Chris Warren and I did not like him on the team.

I think Emmitt was a decent receiver out of the backfield and he took away better opportunities.

 

[Aikbach]

but how you finish. 3 SB to 0 and married to Gisele.

Tuck rule gave him both.

Or do you think its love that binds them together?:

 

[OAM]

Another of mine that is not popular. I was not happy when we signed Chris Warren and I did not like him on the team.

I think Emmitt was a decent receiver out of the backfield and he took away better opportunities.

That's extremely interesting game planning. Should we have went deeper or passed it off to Warren as opposed to Emmit? Warren was with us as until 2000 as we know and was a former B-ball player. So he could go up and get it, especially for a RB in the flats.

We obviously expected Emmit to make plays in that regard and thus didn't give Warren sufficient opportunities where he most likely would have been more successful? The Marion, hard blocking and running Barber, to Felix, shifty/ deceptive and developing hands Jones, may be a wrinkle involving this post?

 

[Aikbach]

That's extremely interesting game planning. Should we have went deeper or passed it off to Warren as opposed to Emmit? Warren was with us as until 2000 as we know and was a former B-ball player. So he could go up and get it, especially for a RB in the flats.

We obviously expected Emmit to make plays in that regard and thus didn't give Warren sufficient opportunities where he most likely would have been more successful? The Marion, hard blocking and running Barber, to Felix, shifty/ deceptive and developing hands, Jones may be a wrinkle involving this post?

Chan Gailey is a poor man's Bill Parcells, which is to say they played the same predictable execution reliant football, but Gailey was humble if not meek while Parcells was brash and proud. Gailey took over for Ron Erhardt in Pittburgh as the OC before coming to Dallas, Earhardt was a parcells coordinator in Super Bowl XXV, same philosophical stripes.

 

[OAM]

Chan Gailey is a poor man's Bill Parcells, which is to say they played the same predictable execution reliant football, but Gailey was humble if not meek while Parcells was brash and proud. Gailey took over for Ron Erhardt in Pittburgh as the OC before coming to Dallas, Earhardt was a parcells coordinator in Super Bowl XXV, same philosophical stripes.

I so hope we don't become this type of offense as it's obvious you don't want to be either. Do you think we'll be set up player and game plan wise vertically enough to avoid this?

I know BP won a couple trophies like this but his defenses made game changing plays. His defenses were more dominating and exotic than his offenses, non Cowboy of course. Chan's were not as we know.