silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
- Messages
- 24,195
- Reaction score
- 25
Big Dakota;1911232 said:Don't bet on it.
It's simple-- if Wade wins the Super Bowl next year, he keeps his job... Garrett or no Garrett...
Big Dakota;1911232 said:Don't bet on it.
silverbear;1912246 said:It's simple-- if Wade wins the Super Bowl next year, he keeps his job... Garrett or no Garrett...
rcaldw;1911357 said:I like this move and I don't like it.
*I like it in that I think he retained his best option as the HC, but made him the assistant.
*I don't like it in that I think he retained his 2nd best option (Wade) as the HC.
We don't lose Garrett, but we, again, have a very strange situation at the top of the coaching chain.
Whether it has been Barry Switzer, Chan Gailey, or Dave Campo, whenever it is PERCEIVED that the HC isn't really very powerful, it hasn't worked out well.
silverbear;1912246 said:It's simple-- if Wade wins the Super Bowl next year, he keeps his job... Garrett or no Garrett...
silverbear;1912246 said:It's simple-- if Wade wins the Super Bowl next year, he keeps his job... Garrett or no Garrett...
Bach;1912255 said:That's the only way.
Big Dakota;1912642 said:We win the SB next year, we could bring in Top and i wouldn't care.
silverbear;1912665 said:Only if they brought him in to coach special teams...
silverbear;1912665 said:Only if they brought him in to coach special teams...
Kilyin;1912925 said:This deal seems a little Snyder-esque to me. Let's not try to emulate the Deadskins. They aren't exactly a model of success.
superpunk;1912934 said:Not exactly apples to apples.
They were paying for assistants to come in - we're paying to retain our own people. In my eyes, that's pretty significant. It's not that we're going out mongering for coaches - Jerry's just trying to keep his good employees in house.