JonJon;5038915 said:
This. I'm not sure Vacarro is that guy. I hear people using the excuse that he didn't create many turnovers or make lots of impact plays because he was also playing CB. I think that is a bogus excuse because CB's can also create turnovers and make a big impact. I just thin he has terrible ball skills and I don't know if that skill set is what is needed for a team that is already turnover-deficient.
Yeah I don't know that he is that guy either.
I just meant the aspect that I would rather have a coverage guy and I don't care about someone who can lay someone else out. Frankly that type of hybrid safety that is more like a SS that the cowboys FO have been touting over the years has not really paid off to well for them.
If that means another safety in the draft I am ok with it.
However if the top two OGs are off the board, If Richardson is off the board and if Tavon is off the board (homer pick) Unless someone else falls that nobody seen happening (like one of the top OTs or Star) I don't see the problem with taking Vaccaro.
He is not my personal pick or desire but I can't fault them for taking the best available player at that spot and if those scenarios fall into place I think he would be the BPA at that point.