We are 3-0 against undefeated teams since 2006

[Boyzmamacita]

2006: Indy (10-0) at Dallas - Cowboys win
2007: GB (11-0) at Dallas - Cowboys win
2009: Dallas at NO (13-0) - Cowboys win

Good stuff right there.

 

[dallascowboyfanboy]

We are 2-1 against undefeated teams since 2006. 10/14/07 Patriots beats us 48-27 we were both 5-0 at the time. We stayed in the game until the fourth quarter where we were outscored 17-3

 

[Z mann R2]

I was about to say....um Pats in 07!

 

[Boyzmamacita]

We are 2-1 against undefeated teams since 2006. 10/14/07 Patriots beats us 48-27 we were both 5-0 at the time. We stayed in the game until the fourth quarter where we were outscored 17-3

I was about to say....um Pats in 07!

Oh yeah. How could I forget that one? Well we are 3-0 against undefeated teams when we are not undefeated ourselves. But that makes us 3-1 including the Pats game, not 2-1. A 3-1 record is still pretty good.

 

[Vtwin]

But past history has no impact on the present, right?

 

[jimmy40]

We are 2-1 against undefeated teams since 2006. 10/14/07 Patriots beats us 48-27 we were both 5-0 at the time. We stayed in the game until the fourth quarter where we were outscored 17-3

 

[Signals]

But past history has no impact on the present, right?

Only to the degree that history repeats itself.

 

[newera]

So what are the parameters that we are using for the term "undefeated"?

I don't remember Tampa having lost any games before we beat them....also the Broncos beat us this year and they hadn't lost a game at that point either. I see the point you are trying to make, but you are not making it very well.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

So what are the parameters that we are using for the term "undefeated"?

I don't remember Tampa having lost any games before we beat them....also the Broncos beat us this year and they hadn't lost a game at that point either. I see the point you are trying to make, but you are not making it very well.

OK then, let's make it teams that are at least 10-0. We are 3-0 against those teams since 2006.

 

[newera]

OK then, let's make it teams that are at least 10-0. We are 3-0 against those teams since 2006.

Ok. sounds good to me

Edit: Maybe not as good as I originally thought. As grp pointed out, the Colts were only 9-0.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

 

[grp05]

OK then, let's make it teams that are at least 10-0. We are 3-0 against those teams since 2006.

The Colts were only 9-0 because they had a bye in Week 6.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

The Colts were only 9-0 because they had a bye in Week 6.

OK, you guys have totally destroyed this for me.

[/thread]

 

[Hostile]

But past history has no impact on the present, right?

That is correct. It does not. You execute today what you are prepared for right now.

 

[DragonCowboy]

Sorry to do this to you but I am pretty sure the Packers had one loss

 

[SilberBlau]

Sorry to do this to you but I am pretty sure the Packers had one loss

true... funny thread though ^^

 

[zrinkill]

But past history has no impact on the present, right?

Only when its good .... :

And the "make up" thread got buried ..... so Merry Christmas.

 

[Vtwin]

Only when its good .... :

And the "make up" thread got buried ..... so Merry Christmas.

:beer2:

 

[proline]

2006: Indy (10-0) at Dallas - Cowboys win
2007: GB (11-0) at Dallas - Cowboys win
2009: Dallas at NO (13-0) - Cowboys win

Good stuff right there.

Frustrating stuff, actually. I hate that we CAN play like that, but that we DON'T do it in the rest of the games! It's got to be frustrating for everyone in the organization, too.