jamesdojr
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,036
- Reaction score
- 374
We aren't going to stop Aaron Rogers. It's unlikely the Dallas defense will hold Green Bay under 24 or 28. However since our offense should be able to move the ball...we can win the game by forcing four or five punts and limiting the damage in the red zone.
Curiously we may have inadvertently discovered a formula to slow Rogers during the Lions game. I speak of what Marinelli did out of necessity during that Detroit game because of injuries. Dallas lacked healthy defensive linemen and we were forced to rush just three down linemen.
Our defense was wildly successful when employing this scheme and was able to generate even more pass rush than earlier in the game. We also could occasionally drop back and saturate the zone.
Rogers is simply too nimble for most defense linemen. Even when rushers get past the Packers very good pass blockers...these defenders are too often helpless to close the deal and make a sack. The packer quarterback is athletic and makes it look easy sidestepping and dodging most 270 pound defenders.
If we rush 3 big guys but blitz random linebackers or cornerbacks I suspect we can keep Aaron from extending plays like he is so apt to do. We can bring quicker attackers to close on Aaron and close him out. Yes we may be a bit more vulnerable to the run game, but the plan of attack should be the head of the snake and that snake is Rogers and those extended plays.
Make no mistake... GB is a different team. They are hitting on all cylinders offensively now. They weren't before.
But our pass rush is a thousand times better.. and GB better take note or Irving, Mayowa, and McClain will bury Rodgers. I think that 3 man rush is going to wreak havoc. And 8 guys out there covering 4 or 5, makes it tough on a QB.
We win this game if Irving, Mayowa, and McClain have great games. Simple as that.