Doomsday101
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 107,762
- Reaction score
- 39,034
Well obviously the Browns weren't blaming that on his regression or they wouldn't have dumped him. There had to be more to it than that to give up on him after only 2 seasons. Aikman's first year was rough because he was playing for what many consider one of the top 10 worst teams ever and his second season was rough because the team still wasn't very good. Even during those seasons you could see the potential Aikman had which is why the Cowboys traded Steve Walsh and not him. Weeden showed no growth or potential in Cleveland which is why he was cut loose. No point in arguing it any further let's wait until Sunday and see how he performs then we'll have a better idea where the teams future the next 7 or so games stands with him.
Well Obviously the browns are piss poor team managed poorly so what they think I really could care less. Yeah they are great they managed to run off every QB they have. As for Troy yes he was on a poor team so was Weeden. Weeden showed no growth 2 years 2 different system, you will not grow in that situation. As I said I will go by what he does in Dallas under Linehan not some idiot team who is poorly coached and ran.
You keep talking Cleveland? as if they were some great team that Weeden destroyed when reality is they are their worst enemy and have done none of these QB any favor other than releasing them to give them some type of chance to get with a real team,