Weeden vs Cassel

31smackdown

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
223
Just wanted to open up the Weeden vs Cassel debate. I honestly can find no reason to continue to start Weeden given what he has shown the past 3 weeks. The only real argument for Weeden that I have heard is that he does not turn the ball over and Cassel is an unknown and might have more turnovers.

I don't know a ton about Cassel, but just watching a few clips of him play here and there you can see that he does things that Weeden has not shown any ability or willingness to do.

For example:
His pocket presence, mobility and movement is much better than Weeden and he will actually step up in the pocket or roll from pressure while looking downfield and he can even scramble for a few yards if he has to.

His play fakes, look like play fakes and he can drop back from under center, take his drop and throw with timing

He looks to push the ball down the field and will give his receivers a chance to make a play 1 on 1. Definitely not looking to check down.

He will throw over linebackers and can throw the back shoulder throw.

In simple terms he looks like he is running the offense and not constantly checking down or skipping progressions because he is not comfortable with reading a defense.

Some potential issues:

He gets into trouble trying to squeeze the ball in to short underneath routes against zone and sometimes does not see all of the LB traffic. Better in the 8-15 yard range.

Can have issues in scramble drill by the endzone not seeing underneath defenders as players are running across the back of the endzone. These are cases where Weeden would have already just thrown randomly to his predetermined read or have been sacked so this is something Weeden doesn't even get to in a normal play.

He sometimes over estimates his arm and comes up 3 yards short on 40+ yard throws.. the good news is that he actually throws them and give the play time to develop.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cassell cant be worse

Why can't he be worse? He can easily be worse. Different is not necessarily better. The guy's a career journeyman whose stats have declined steadily from their peak over the last several seasons. You may see some more completions downfield, but if they're offset by more picks, it's not going to matter. Sure, it gives the illusion of progress, but it's really just motion and not progress.

That said, we do have to look seriously at whether or not we think Cassel might be an actual upgrade. Just because I'm saying he's not necessarily an upgrade, it doesn't mean he's not, in fact, an upgrade.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
Cassel has had two decent years, 08 in NE and 10 in KC.

Both years, he had a ton of talent around him and didn't really have to make many plays. He never recorded a 4,000 yard season, despite that, but he proved to be a good bus driver when there is a lot of talent around him. When there aren't a lot of weapons and a great run game supporting him, he has been awful.

He will be awful in Dallas if playing without Dez.
 

foofighters

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,453
Reaction score
7,148
Why can't he be worse? He can easily be worse. Different is not necessarily better. The guy's a career journeyman whose stats have declined steadily from their peak over the last several seasons. You may see some more completions downfield, but if they're offset by more picks, it's not going to matter. Sure, it gives the illusion of progress, but it's really just motion and not progress.

That said, we do have to look seriously at whether or not we think Cassel might be an actual upgrade. Just because I'm saying he's not necessarily an upgrade, it doesn't mean he's not, in fact, an upgrade.

Keeping things the same and hoping for different results is silly...
 

pgreptom

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
551
What I like about him is that he's finished a season with a 90+ qbr.. Under two different coaches. Good enough for me.
 

punchnjudy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,786
Reaction score
1,872
I'm hoping that if Dez comes back Cassell can be the equivalent of Garrett. Basically, a guy who doesn't start because he lacks the arm strength but can read a defense and make throws with enough touch and accuracy for a ball hawk like Dez to make a play. However, watching some footage of him on youtube from 2014, I was disappointed in his decision making. I will say the protection wasn't great in that game, but still...

 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
Just wanted to open up the Weeden vs Cassel debate. I honestly can find no reason to continue to start Weeden given what he has shown the past 3 weeks. The only real argument for Weeden that I have heard is that he does not turn the ball over and Cassel is an unknown and might have more turnovers.

I don't know a ton about Cassel, but just watching a few clips of him play here and there you can see that he does things that Weeden has not shown any ability or willingness to do.

For example:
His pocket presence, mobility and movement is much better than Weeden and he will actually step up in the pocket or roll from pressure while looking downfield and he can even scramble for a few yards if he has to.

His play fakes, look like play fakes and he can drop back from under center, take his drop and throw with timing

He looks to push the ball down the field and will give his receivers a chance to make a play 1 on 1. Definitely not looking to check down.

He will throw over linebackers and can throw the back shoulder throw.

In simple terms he looks like he is running the offense and not constantly checking down or skipping progressions because he is not comfortable with reading a defense.

Some potential issues:

He gets into trouble trying to squeeze the ball in to short underneath routes against zone and sometimes does not see all of the LB traffic. Better in the 8-15 yard range.

Can have issues in scramble drill by the endzone not seeing underneath defenders as players are running across the back of the endzone. These are cases where Weeden would have already just thrown randomly to his predetermined read or have been sacked so this is something Weeden doesn't even get to in a normal play.

He sometimes over estimates his arm and comes up 3 yards short on 40+ yard throws.. the good news is that he actually throws them and give the play time to develop.

Hope Cassel plays this week and I'm talking the whole game !!!!
 

fortdick

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,496
Reaction score
745
I think Weedon was a plug the hole player and the contingency was to get Cassel, or a Cassel like substance as long long term fix in the case of Romo going down. After they bye, Cassel will be up to speed and will take over. If not, I may actually begin to suspect our front office.
 

maxdallasfan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
1,528
Cassell will throw deep, and all of these punts will turn into INT's.

Pick your poison.
 

31smackdown

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
223
Cassel has had two decent years, 08 in NE and 10 in KC.

Both years, he had a ton of talent around him and didn't really have to make many plays. He never recorded a 4,000 yard season, despite that, but he proved to be a good bus driver when there is a lot of talent around him. When there aren't a lot of weapons and a great run game supporting him, he has been awful.

He will be awful in Dallas if playing without Dez.

He somehow managed to win multiple games without Adrian Peterson in Minnesota . It's not like they had an all world cast there. Is your hope that Weeden is good enough or the teams that we are playing are bad enough that Weeden won't need to do more than he has done so far because of the Dallas defense? The offense is crippled with him playing. What gives you any confidence that Weeden will improve? It's not anyone else's fault that Weeden is not doing certain things that are completely within his control. Will Cassel throw more int's? I don't know, but if that happens because he is using the whole field and running the offense then at least that makes the defense play honest. Weeden has basically gone into a shell and has no intangible skills... can barely run hurry up, no sense of urgency, bad play fakes, no mobility or ability to extend plays, no hard count, etc.. and most importantly he has never shown the ability to overcome any of these things, this is who he is. For three weeks we have seen the same guy and it's not good enough.
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
Just wanted to open up the Weeden vs Cassel debate. I honestly can find no reason to continue to start Weeden given what he has shown the past 3 weeks. The only real argument for Weeden that I have heard is that he does not turn the ball over and Cassel is an unknown and might have more turnovers.

I don't know a ton about Cassel, but just watching a few clips of him play here and there you can see that he does things that Weeden has not shown any ability or willingness to do.

For example:
His pocket presence, mobility and movement is much better than Weeden and he will actually step up in the pocket or roll from pressure while looking downfield and he can even scramble for a few yards if he has to.

His play fakes, look like play fakes and he can drop back from under center, take his drop and throw with timing

He looks to push the ball down the field and will give his receivers a chance to make a play 1 on 1. Definitely not looking to check down.

He will throw over linebackers and can throw the back shoulder throw.

In simple terms he looks like he is running the offense and not constantly checking down or skipping progressions because he is not comfortable with reading a defense.

Some potential issues:

He gets into trouble trying to squeeze the ball in to short underneath routes against zone and sometimes does not see all of the LB traffic. Better in the 8-15 yard range.

Can have issues in scramble drill by the endzone not seeing underneath defenders as players are running across the back of the endzone. These are cases where Weeden would have already just thrown randomly to his predetermined read or have been sacked so this is something Weeden doesn't even get to in a normal play.

He sometimes over estimates his arm and comes up 3 yards short on 40+ yard throws.. the good news is that he actually throws them and give the play time to develop.

Dallas has a chance to win with Cassel !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Wayne02

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,350
Reaction score
2,049
I don't want to hype up Cassell to be some sort of savior or anything, I mean, he's a backup for a reason, but you just can't continue to roll Weeden out there. He's awful.
 
Top