This reminds me of employees who think the CEO doesn't "do" anything. Head coach oversees the entire staff and roster.
Granted, in Dallas the HC is neutered but that's a Jerry thing. JG's eventual replacement will do the same if he wants to keep his job.
What did Jimmy do? What does Belichick do? I’m not saying Garrett is at their level - clearly he is miles from that - but lots of head coaches, including some highly successful ones - rely heavily on their coordinators and assistants. A head coach is much like a CEO - he indicates what he wants to see, but the underlines put the systems in place to make it happen.
Garrett works his butt off. You need to more familiarize yourself with the day in the life of an NFL HC. You are only revealing your own ignorance by asking what he does. You don't have to like the man or want him to have the job he has but he does give 100% to this team.offense
scheme design - moore given job to modernize offense to make it less predictable. jerry publicly said that moore needs to go to him if garrett tries to interfere with that
play calling - moore
defense
scheme - richard/marinelli
play calling - richard?
other areas
drafting - some input
clock management - often with disastrous results
press conferences - garrett
serving jones' upon demand - garrett
offense
scheme design - moore given job to modernize offense to make it less predictable. jerry publicly said that moore needs to go to him if garrett tries to interfere with that
play calling - moore
defense
scheme - richard/marinelli
play calling - richard?
other areas
drafting - some input
clock management - often with disastrous results
press conferences - garrett
serving jones' upon demand - garrett
And why this is all on Jerry. Somewhere along the line everyone tired of bashing on the core culprit.Another bash Garrett thread huh...i guess welcome to the off-season right.
You guys do realize no matter how much you hate him, he's not going anywhere until Jerry decides
I'm ready for a change from Garrett; however, Garrett is good at the things that made Wade Phillips a terrible Head Coach.
The players have always given great effort under Garrett. They quit on Wade.
Garrett eliminated the overwhelming sense of entitlement among the players that was prevalent under Wade.
Wade was a disaster in many press conferences. Garrett is boring but does not look like a deer in the headlights when difficult questions arrise.
The players generally treat Garrett like the Head Coach and many start to sound like him. Wade constantly referenced Jerry anytime he was questioned by the media and players referred to Jerry more than to the Head Coach when questioned about the team's direction, etc..
Dave Campo was similar to Wade; although he referred to Jerry as Mr. Jones instead of Jerry.
Chan Gailey's claim to fame as the Cowboys HC was convincing Jerry NOT to draft Randy Moss.
Stop it. Garrett is NOT a good HC by any stretch of YOUR imagination. Every other coach was better than Garrett you mentioned. They all knew football better than the hapless Garrett.
Garrett is the Chaz Green of coaches. You remember Chaz Green dont you?
YepCampo went 5-11 three years in a row. Whether or not a coach has the players is immaterial, the head coach's job is to win. That's how they are ultimately judged. Garrett has won playoff games and division titles. Campo did not.
Now Campo was a good defensive coach, Phillips also. But to say they are better head coaches than Garrett, based on what head coaches are judged for, is inaccurate...
what does Pete Carrol Do? he claps ad chews gum at the same timeoffense
scheme design - moore given job to modernize offense to make it less predictable. jerry publicly said that moore needs to go to him if garrett tries to interfere with that
play calling - moore
defense
scheme - richard/marinelli
play calling - richard?
other areas
drafting - some input
clock management - often with disastrous results
press conferences - garrett
serving jones' upon demand - garrett
Campo went 5-11 three years in a row. Whether or not a coach has the players is immaterial, the head coach's job is to win. That's how they are ultimately judged. Garrett has won playoff games and division titles. Campo did not.
Now Campo was a good defensive coach, Phillips also. But to say they are better head coaches than Garrett, based on what head coaches are judged for, is inaccurate...
So a coach should make the playoffs and win playoff games with no talent? Whatever you say buddy. Garrett is horrid. His own owners actions bare that out.
Both Campo and Phillips were football minds that understood the game of football. Garrett has no clue about football.