What happened to the NASCAR package?

Enlightened32

Active Member
Messages
284
Reaction score
115
LDE- Lawerence

3Tc- Hardy

NT- Crawford

RDE-Gregory

Thought that was what everybody was waiting for......it disappeared. Any guesses?

Don't think you saw that lineup once Sunday....Very disappointing

Coaches over think this one? Comments....:huh:
They did run it at least once Sunday, but it was Jack Crawford instead of Gregory on the outside. I think they are waiting until Gregory is no longer on a "pitch count".
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,729
Reaction score
95,249
They played snaps with Hardy at DT and Gregory at DE with Crawford at the other DT spot. I'm not certain who was at the other DE spot other than Jack Crawford was at LDE on one of them.

Hardy had a sack playing DT.

Wasn't Jack Crawford at DT when he had his sack?
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
LDE- Lawerence

3Tc- Hardy

NT- Crawford

RDE-Gregory

Thought that was what everybody was waiting for......And like all the carries Christine Michael was supposed to get ...it disappeared. Any guesses?

Don't think you saw that lineup once Sunday....Very disappointing

Coaches over think this one? Comments....:huh:

I guess it drove away.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
The funny thing is that they did use that package with Hardy and Crawford as the DTs with Gregory at DE but the OP thinks it never happened.

I mean Randy played like 8 first half snaps and am unsure if he got any significant work in the 2nd.

Hopefully this was just working Randy back in slowly.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,028
Reaction score
37,176
They played snaps with Hardy at DT and Gregory at DE with Crawford at the other DT spot. I'm not certain who was at the other DE spot other than Jack Crawford was at LDE on one of them.

Hardy had a sack playing DT.

Yes, I saw a lot of different mixtures out there. I think at one point we had Lawrence at RE, Crawford at DT, Hardy at DT and Jack Crawford at LE. I believe we also had Mincey at LE some with Hardy either at the other DE spot or inside at DT.

I'd have to go back and look, but I think we limited Gergory's snaps ... so I'd expect his role at RE to expand.
 

dirtycallahan

Well-Known Member
Messages
422
Reaction score
403
I thought that they did not want Gregory out there because they did not want extended exposure to the Giants no huddle.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,077
Reaction score
16,851
Just an example of a fanbase getting overly hyped about something...happily egged on by the Jerry Jones PR machine.

DeMarcus has never proved a thing. Gregory is just a rookie.

Overhyped...followed by unrealistic expectations. Most NFL passing plays get the ball out mighty quick these days...you will rarely see 5, 6 sacks in a game nowadays unless the quarterback is RG FolLee... or some rookie.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,901
Reaction score
112,894
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That is really a package you will see more when Dallas gets some decent sized leads in a game. With Romo and Dez being out and the OL having to get healthy, it has been a real uphill battle to get any kind of substantial lead, unfortunately.

Against the Giants, they just couldn't get out in front enough to put the Giants in a whole lot of passing situations. Plus, when that RB with the crazy name started gashing the defense on runs, I knew right then that we wouldn't see a whole lot of the nickle pass rush line.

It will be there once Dallas can get a decent lead and put the other team in a passing/come-from-behind mode.

Correctamundo!
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
I wonder if Gregory was still tender and they didn't want to press him or if there was another reason he only got 8 snaps, iirc, during the game.
 
Top