What happens if secondary looks REALLY good

[burmafrd]

The secondary looks REALLY good this saturday WITHOUT Roy playing?

 

[joseephuss]

The secondary looks REALLY good this saturday WITHOUT Roy playing?

Define really good? Take into account that this is the 29th ranked offense starting their 4th QB for the season who happens to be a rookie. Really good should be a shutout and a QB rating of under 50 considering all the circumstances.

 

[zrinkill]

I am sure the usual suspects will gloat and think that it proves something.

But thats like saying that Terry Glenn was holding the Offense back since we are better since he has not played.

 

[superpunk]

We are playing Matt Moore and the Carolina Panthers.

 

[Hostile]

The secondary looks REALLY good this saturday WITHOUT Roy playing?

You'll orgasm and call it losing your virginity?

I give up. What?

 

[smarta5150]

You'll orgasm and call it losing your virginity?

I give up. What?

 

[Chocolate Lab]

We rejoice at the depth we have at safety and wait a week for Roy to come back and kick Commander butt.

 

[5Stars]

The secondary looks REALLY good this saturday WITHOUT Roy playing?

The Cowboys win the game?

Is this a trick question?

 

[Boysboy]

The secondary looks REALLY good this saturday WITHOUT Roy playing?

Huh? It's not like their UFA rookie is Tom Brady. Coming off that ugly loss to our most hated division rival AND with all the so-called distractions this week, I just want a WIN to get closer to HF.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

I am sure the usual suspects will gloat and think that it proves something.

But thats like saying that Terry Glenn was holding the Offense back since we are better since he has not played.

And I am sure the usual supsects will gloat and think it proves nothing .

 

[zrinkill]

And I am sure the usual supsects will gloat and think it proves nothing .

speak of the devil?

 

[stealth]

fuel the agendas

one way to look is the panthers suck and it proves nothing, ROY ROCKS

other way, ****ZORS DID YOU SEE HOW MUCH BETTER KEITH DAVIS IS THAN ROY!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!1111eleven

 

[aikemirv]

I mean seriously, do even the Roy bashers think Davis is better in coverage?

I mean please is this even a valid topic?

Is it also going to mean that Nate Jones and Brown are better than Watkins?

Good Grief:bang2:

 

[burmafrd]

I have to be honest. I do not think davis is that much worse then Roy. And he might have gotten better.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

speak of the devil?

Not really .

I consider myself among the more reasonable Roy Williams debaters.

Which is, a solid player, that has weaknesses just like every other player in the National Football League.

However, I do feel he is not playing at a Roy Williams Type level and that is really meant to be compliment.

 

[burmafrd]

We have seem stranger things. Like an undrafted FA QB becoming pro bowl in less then a year. 7th rd picks starting and playing at a near pro bowl level. So would it be all that incredible?

 

[smarta5150]

I have to be honest. I do not think davis is that much worse then Roy. And he might have gotten better.

Stop it please. You are going to pull a muscle reaching.

 

[Hostile]

We have seem stranger things. Like an undrafted FA QB becoming pro bowl in less then a year. 7th rd picks starting and playing at a near pro bowl level. So would it be all that incredible?

In a word...yes.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

I will say this again, I never thought the day would come when the masses would clamor for Keith Davis in Roy Williams' stead.

When the very extreme Roy Williams detractors inflate his lack of coverage and tackling skills, they really are describing Keith Davis.

Keith Davis is his backup for a reason.

 

[5Stars]

We have seem stranger things. Like an undrafted FA QB becoming pro bowl in less then a year. 7th rd picks starting and playing at a near pro bowl level. So would it be all that incredible?

Has Matt Moore sat and learned on the bench for four years?

(are you drinking)