What Position Is Parsons

I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
ROVER stud
 
I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
The position is called, football player. What does that actually mean?. It means I can do just about anything and anywhere. Plug me in and watch me play. We need more football players
 
Von Miller does just fine dodging and shedding
that the closest comp for Parsons for sure..VM..that nice ceiling to strive for that's for sure..

positive for parsons career is DC that recognizes this player isnt a one potion player, hes a star in the making and can play just about anywhere o nthe field and wreak havoc..
 
At 6'3" and 245 pounds he's a LB and situational pass rusher. Next question.

Not so fast....Take a guess who the below player is ....Hint: He just got paid handsomely and is one of the TOP DE in the NFL

Player (?) is 6'4" 252 lb best DE in the NFL
Parsons is 6'3" 245 lbs best rookie in the NFL

Parsons is a beast at DE....
 
I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
he is a defensive football player....'nuff said...there is no need to fit a player into a position unless you are franchised...then it matters only because of the money
 
I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
Id say right now he is a Leo
 
I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
Anyone he wants to play!!!!
 
I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?

This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.

Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?

Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.

Thoughts?
Wherever Quinn puts him.....doesn't matter what we think....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,680
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top