ROVER studI understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
The position is called, football player. What does that actually mean?. It means I can do just about anything and anywhere. Plug me in and watch me play. We need more football playersI understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
that the closest comp for Parsons for sure..VM..that nice ceiling to strive for that's for sure..Von Miller does just fine dodging and shedding
At 6'3" and 245 pounds he's a LB and situational pass rusher. Next question.
he is a defensive football player....'nuff said...there is no need to fit a player into a position unless you are franchised...then it matters only because of the moneyI understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
Id say right now he is a LeoI understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
Anyone he wants to play!!!!I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
Wherever Quinn puts him.....doesn't matter what we think....I understand some want Parsons to be a D.E. It has been a long time since this team has had a real War Daddy on the end creating pressure ad sacks. But with the returning players on the front line would it be better to have Parsons as a LB and move him around?
This is the thinking. If he is a D.E., he is either on one side or the other. It will be difficult to surprise an offense. Yet if he were a LB, he could be moved around and his assignment on every play will be a shocker.
Having Parsons line up on the hip[ of Gregory or Lawrence, then will he rush? Or will he cover?
Seems the LB position gives him the ability to sneak attack and the DC the option to wreak havoc with all the possibilities.
Thoughts?
