CowboyMike;1536216 said:I'll quote my grandpa on this subject. He's had the priviledge of watching every Cowboys QB in history. And what did he say during the thanksgiving game?
"Who does that remind you of? Roger."
Big Dakota;1536218 said:I think the Favre comparisons are right on the money, minus the cannon arm. He moves so much like Bret in my opinion and has that gun slinger way about him. Maybe without the huge arm Bret possessed he'll be able to harness a little more control than Bret ever did?
I'll say I agree with this.Big Dakota;1536218 said:I think the Favre comparisons are right on the money, minus the cannon arm. He moves so much like Bret in my opinion and has that gun slinger way about him. Maybe without the huge arm Bret possessed he'll be able to harness a little more control than Bret ever did?
THUMPER said:The biggest difference is their attitudes. Staubach was all business, it was war and he was going to lead his men to victory. With Romo, he is having the time of his life out there and wants his guys to have fun winning the game. Both lead to victory but by very different paths.
Va_BoysFan4 Life;1536255 said:I agree 100% that Staubach and Favre are the two that Romo remind me of.
I guess Roger's Naval Academy and miltary background plays a big part in that. However, I really enjoy Romo's "Kid living the Ultimate Dream" attitude in which he plays with. His excitement and his dedication to be the best is something his team mates can feed off.
However, I think he has that "hollywood star quality" that have not been seen at a high level since Joe Namath.
Big Dakota;1536218 said:I think the Favre comparisons are right on the money, minus the cannon arm. He moves so much like Bret in my opinion and has that gun slinger way about him. Maybe without the huge arm Bret possessed he'll be able to harness a little more control than Bret ever did?
IMO, your Staubach - Farve - Romo observations are quite accurate and very well stated.THUMPER;1536228 said:He reminds me a lot of Staubach. He is a leader, moves well, makes plays on the move, has a good arm but not great, and has that certain something that makes people follow him.
The biggest difference is their attitudes. Staubach was all business, it was war and he was going to lead his men to victory. With Romo, he is having the time of his life out there and wants his guys to have fun winning the game. Both lead to victory but by very different paths.
I really enjoy watching Romo play. His game reminds me of Favre too in how he plays with such zest and enjoyment, like a kid, as well as his improvisation. Not that Romo isn't serious about the game but he is having fun while doing it. That makes him very enjoyable to watch and impossible not to like him.
Of current players I would say Romo is a combination of Favre and Brady. People who say "Romo faltered down the stretch" obviously weren't watching the games or paying attention because he played extremely well over the last 6 games of the year, including the playoff game. Our defense could stop no one and everything landed on Romo's shoulders. I believe he handled it very well and pulled out wins against the Giants and Falcons and nearly did against Detroit and Seattle.
By next year those same people will be comparing Romo with some of the best in the game and wondering why he wasn't drafted.
I'll second that.Hostile;1536234 said:I'll say I agree with this.