percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
(Offensively, that is.)
They didn't score more points.
points per drive
Dallas 2.25 (4th)
Detroit 1.94 (14th)
They didn't pass better overall.
team pass rating
Dallas 95.7 (7th)
Detroit 84.2 (18th)
They weren't better at converting overall.
% of plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 32.0 (4th)
Detroit 30.3 (8th)
They weren't better at going the length of the field.
% of drives that began inside own 35- (avg. 20-) yard line and ended in TD
Dallas 23.9 (3rd)
Detroit 20.5 (11th)
They weren't better at passing in the red zone.
% of red zone pass plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 39.7 (4th) (Romo 100.7)
Detroit 37.2 (6th) (Stafford 96.6)
They weren't better at running in the red zone.
% of red zone run plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 37.0 (4th)
Detroit 34.4 (8th)
They didn't run better overall
% of run plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 26.6 (3rd)
Detroit 24.5 (10th)
They didn't protect the football better.
% of drives that ended in turnovers.
Dallas 10.7 (8th)
Detroit 18.0 (31st)
What the Lions did do a little better than the Cowboys in 2013 was pile up yardage.
yards per drive
Detroit 33.2 (8th)
Dallas 31.0 (12th)
And what they did a lot better was convert 3rd downs much more successfully.
% of 3rd down plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Detroit 43.4 (6th)
Dallas 35.6 (23rd)
With the huge caveat that only 18.8% of Dallas' offensive plays were on 3rd down.
As for the other downs (the other 81.2% of our plays)...
% of 1st, 2nd, and 4th down plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 31.1% (2nd)
Detroit 27.0% (11th)
And finally, here are the punt-to-turnover ratios of each team's drives.
Dallas 80/20
Detroit 68/32
And TD-to-turnovers
Dallas 70/30
Detroit 57/43
They didn't score more points.
points per drive
Dallas 2.25 (4th)
Detroit 1.94 (14th)
They didn't pass better overall.
team pass rating
Dallas 95.7 (7th)
Detroit 84.2 (18th)
They weren't better at converting overall.
% of plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 32.0 (4th)
Detroit 30.3 (8th)
They weren't better at going the length of the field.
% of drives that began inside own 35- (avg. 20-) yard line and ended in TD
Dallas 23.9 (3rd)
Detroit 20.5 (11th)
They weren't better at passing in the red zone.
% of red zone pass plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 39.7 (4th) (Romo 100.7)
Detroit 37.2 (6th) (Stafford 96.6)
They weren't better at running in the red zone.
% of red zone run plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 37.0 (4th)
Detroit 34.4 (8th)
They didn't run better overall
% of run plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 26.6 (3rd)
Detroit 24.5 (10th)
They didn't protect the football better.
% of drives that ended in turnovers.
Dallas 10.7 (8th)
Detroit 18.0 (31st)
What the Lions did do a little better than the Cowboys in 2013 was pile up yardage.
yards per drive
Detroit 33.2 (8th)
Dallas 31.0 (12th)
And what they did a lot better was convert 3rd downs much more successfully.
% of 3rd down plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Detroit 43.4 (6th)
Dallas 35.6 (23rd)
With the huge caveat that only 18.8% of Dallas' offensive plays were on 3rd down.
As for the other downs (the other 81.2% of our plays)...
% of 1st, 2nd, and 4th down plays that resulted in 1st down or TD
Dallas 31.1% (2nd)
Detroit 27.0% (11th)
And finally, here are the punt-to-turnover ratios of each team's drives.
Dallas 80/20
Detroit 68/32
And TD-to-turnovers
Dallas 70/30
Detroit 57/43