eduncan22;1115205 said:Hind sight is 20/20....
but benching Bledsoe for Romo...
was a mistake.
12-7 at half?
we were down 6-3 to the Texans last week.
Bledsoe didnt lose the game. Romo did.
eduncan22;1115205 said:Hind sight is 20/20....
but benching Bledsoe for Romo...
was a mistake.
12-7 at half?
we were down 6-3 to the Texans last week.
Bledsoe didnt lose the game. Romo did.
Rack;1115243 said:Or maybe he got benched cuz he knew the OL couldn't protect him, and with Romo, at least we had a chance to escape the inevitable (sp?) pressure. I think if we were able to protect him, he wouldn't of been benched.
eduncan22;1115205 said:Hind sight is 20/20....
but benching Bledsoe for Romo...
was a mistake.
12-7 at half?
we were down 6-3 to the Texans last week.
Bledsoe didnt lose the game. Romo did.
A yep.Rack;1115243 said:Bledsoe didn't get benched for what he did in the first half of the Gnats game. He got benched for things he's done all season (or rather, hasn't done?).
Or maybe he got benched cuz he knew the OL couldn't protect him, and with Romo, at least we had a chance to escape the inevitable (sp?) pressure. I think if we were able to protect him, he wouldn't of been benched.
Jimz31;1115242 said:The o-line contributed GREATLY to the demise of this team last week.
NONE of them should have accepted their paychecks with their heads held high.
Cowchips;1115256 said:It's a race to the finish now. Who will retire 1st, Bledsoe or Parcells.
Still in the game, down by 5 points and he goes for the sure loss by putting in Romo. Odds are Bledsoe would have won last night. He usually has 1 decent 1/2 of football.
Oh well..piss this season away for the future. Bill is old and senile and it shows.
Rack;1115243 said:Bledsoe didn't get benched for what he did in the first half of the Gnats game. He got benched for things he's done all season (or rather, hasn't done?).
Or maybe he got benched cuz he knew the OL couldn't protect him, and with Romo, at least we had a chance to escape the inevitable (sp?) pressure. I think if we were able to protect him, he wouldn't of been benched.
Cowchips;1115256 said:It's a race to the finish now. Who will retire 1st, Bledsoe or Parcells.
Still in the game, down by 5 points and he goes for the sure loss by putting in Romo. Odds are Bledsoe would have won last night. He usually has 1 decent 1/2 of football.
Oh well..piss this season away for the future. Bill is old and senile and it shows.
Paniolo22;1115263 said:I personally think he should have given DB at least part of the 3rd quarter. We were still in the game, and getting the ball back. I think Parcells jumped the gun on this one and it cost us 1st place.
Rack;1115243 said:Bledsoe didn't get benched for what he did in the first half of the Gnats game. He got benched for things he's done all season (or rather, hasn't done?).
Or maybe he got benched cuz he knew the OL couldn't protect him, and with Romo, at least we had a chance to escape the inevitable (sp?) pressure. I think if we were able to protect him, he wouldn't of been benched.
Rack;1115243 said:Bledsoe didn't get benched for what he did in the first half of the Gnats game. He got benched for things he's done all season (or rather, hasn't done?).