RxMan;1926580 said:All of the speculation on making trades this time of year made me wonder when was the last time the Cowboys made a meaningful trade. Meaningful as in something better than trading a TE for a 7th round pick.
WoodysGirl;1926596 said:Also like to add that the 2004 looks to be a wash for both the Bills and Dallas.
Bills are about to bounce Losman elsewhere.
Dallas is going to let Julius walk.
Spears involved in trade rumors.
Even tho at one point, it looked like the 'boys got the better end of that deal.
CrazyCowboy;1926612 said:Two #1's for WR Joey Gallaway--meaning we was STUPID
I would say any time you can get a starting quality receiver for a 6th rounder (either in the draft or via trade) you've done pretty well.PJDallasfan;1926621 said:I'd have to say Hershel to the Vikings, as now we can look back and see what we got that put us over the top. Glenn from GB was good, but it did not lead us to the promise land. Last years #1 to Cleveland, we will have to wait and see. When I look at meaningful, I look at what got us to the superbowl.
WoodysGirl;1926596 said:Also like to add that the 2004 looks to be a wash for both the Bills and Dallas.
Bills are about to bounce Losman elsewhere.
Dallas is going to let Julius walk.
Spears involved in trade rumors.
Even tho at one point, it looked like the 'boys got the better end of that deal.
Steven Jackson hasn't exactly been tearing up the league either. He's had one very good year and the others have been Ok to solid. We're not talking LT-level or anything.texbumthelife;1926637 said:But when you think, we could have had Stephen Jackson....
nyc;1926601 said:Nah, Dallas got the better end of that. Spears is a good player. Now, if the Cowboys take something for Spears and that player ends up being a bust, then it's a wash. Right now, if we keep Spears, thats more than the Bills got. Spears is a starting quality player.