Which WR trio would you want?

[Murph80]

Keyshaun TO Glenn

Moss Randle El Loyd

 

[demdcowboys#1]

TO-#1 WR
Glenn-#2 WR
Key-#3 WR
Crayton-#4 WR


NOT Lloyd, Randel El, and Moss

 

[NorTex]

Is this a trick question?

 

[CrazyCowboy]

Keyshaun TO Glenn .....because they are COWBOYS!

 

[CowboysNumeroUno]

Aren't we pretty sure that if T.O. is signed, then Keyshawn is gone?

 

[Dale]

Keyshaun TO Glenn

Moss Randle El Loyd

Well, any receiving trio involving TO deserves an asterisk. If he doesn't ruin the team from the inside out, then I'd take the first trio, hands down.

The only negative is age. If that became our trio, it wouldn't be "our" trio for very long. The Commanders', on the other hand, is young and has the opportunity to improve. But at this stage, I'd take TO over Moss, Glenn over Lloyd and Keyshawn over Randle El.

My concern is that, if we do actually get TO, then that may not be our trio any longer, as Key could get the axe.

 

[theogt]

Aren't we pretty sure that if T.O. is signed, then Keyshawn is gone?

No, not at all.

 

[vpr532]

Hell I'd take TO over all three of those guys combined.

 

[PacoReloaded]

If we sign TO then Keyshawn is gone.

So the real question is the Skins current trio or TO, Glenn, and Crayton.

 

[theogt]

If we sign TO then Keyshawn is gone.

So the real question is the Skins current trio or TO, Glenn, and Crayton.

No. Not necessarily.

 

[kingwhicker]

Please TO is better than all 5 of the others combined, but I still don't want him.

 

[ThreeSportStar80]

Who cares....I'm pissed at the Cowboys for NOT signing anyone of significance.

 

[SkinsFan06]

Im takin our guys......Moss, Lloyd, Randle El, and dont forget David Patten, oooo and i almost forgot Cooley

 

[BigDFan5]

Im takin our guys......Moss, Lloyd, Randle El, and dont forget David Patten, oooo and i almost forgot Cooley

If you look at it honestly from a talent and production standpoint

Owens > Moss

Key > Lloyd

Glenn > El

Crayton < Givens

Witten > Cooley

So while you may take the Skins guys, it would be because they are Commanders and not because they are better

 

[Murph80]

Im takin our guys......Moss, Lloyd, Randle El, and dont forget David Patten, oooo and i almost forgot Cooley

Cooley what?? Oh I should have added Witten I guess.

 

[theogt]

Im takin our guys......Moss, Lloyd, Randle El, and dont forget David Patten, oooo and i almost forgot Cooley

Why? Pure homerism? Objectively TO, Key, and Glenn are a better combination.

 

[SkinsFan06]

If you look at it honestly from a talent and production standpoint

Owens > Moss

Key > Lloyd

Glenn > El

Crayton < Givens

Witten > Cooley

So while you may take the Skins guys, it would be because they are Commanders and not because they are better

You are wrong about that....and *** we dont have Givens, we have Patten

 

[Ken]

Unbelievably,

Ours would be head and shoulders better and MUCH cheaper!

 

[SkinsFan06]

Why? Pure homerism? Objectively TO, Key, and Glenn are a better combination.

ya ok....when we played you guys last year we shut down both Keyshawn and Glenn (except for that TD in the first game)

 

[theogt]

ya ok....when we played you guys last year we shut down both Keyshawn and Glenn (except for that TD in the first game)

I see. Pure homerism.