His role isn’t the biggest role just a product of it.
Unless of course we’ve been witnessing a championship team less a HC? Is that what you believe ?
Which is all part of the dysfunctional situation we have here.No, but he's a byproduct of it. A pet project who would have never been in this position otherwise.
No, but he's a byproduct of it. A pet project who would have never been in this position otherwise.
Which is all part of the dysfunctional situation we have here.
Coming to grips with our obstacles and hindrances Jerry’s ways presents to our football operations will enable us to better evaluate where we are, why we're where we are and potential solutions moving forward.
And why I’ve argued our situation can’t be compared to most of the other NFL franchises as none of them are met with the same handicaps which doesnt allow a HC to have the control most would require which limits the quality of candidates.
That doesn’t relieve our HC and GM of due criticism but it helps better evaluate our dysfunctional situation .
Really? He would’ve been Head coach of the Ravens a job he turned down he possibly would be a Super Bowl Coach with that FO and team. Or possibly the Falcons another team who was highly interested.
In the case of Jason Garrett, I would argue that him having less control has produced better results. The further away he's been removed from playcalling, the better the team has ultimately done.
Which surrounding him with greater Asst coaches and talent on the field is IMO the best solution.In the case of Jason Garrett, I would argue that him having less control has produced better results. The further away he's been removed from playcalling, the better the team has ultimately done.
No he wouldn't. If not for Jerry Jones, he would have never been gifted the job he did get. The one that got him interest - way back in 2011 - from either of those teams.
In the case of Jason Garrett, I would argue that him having less control has produced better results. The further away he's been removed from playcalling, the better the team has ultimately done.
Which surrounding him with greater Asst coaches and talent on the field is IMO the best solution.
This is totally true.No he wouldn't. If not for Jerry Jones, he would have never been gifted the job he did get. The one that got him interest - way back in 2011 - from either of those teams.
We aren’t most teams.Exactly, isn’t this what most team do.
Which surrounding him with greater Asst coaches and talent on the field is IMO the best solution.
I want the Cowboys to win every season, but I also want Garrett to lose. I hate being put in this situation.
Prop him up as much as you can. Or realize he doesn't have it and get yourself a better head coach.
In the case of Jason Garrett, I would argue that him having less control has produced better results. The further away he's been removed from playcalling, the better the team has ultimately done.
This is totally true.
Which further illustrates how incredibly unprecedented and dysfunctional it was naming Garrett” the future of the Dallas Cowboys” in 2007 before he’d even been OC.
Do you honestly believe Jerry would get a better coach, or if he did, would operate in a manner that provided that coach the best opportunity to succeed? I don't. Now, to be very clear, that's not a justification to keep Garrett, just simply whether a coaching change will bring any better results. Jerry said after Parcells left that it was the most miserable period for him as Owner/GM and he wouldn't do that again.