Juke99;2635331 said:In response to the question posed to start this thread...see below.
Matt;2635281 said:Dave Campo, Chan Gailey, A fumbled snap against Seattle, an INT vs NYG
burmafrd;2635290 said:The Captain of the ship is responsible when it hits the iceberg and sinks.
The Captain of the ship is responisble if it runs aground.
The Captain of the ship is responsible for everything that happens to and on that ship.
Jerruh is the captain and he is responsible for picking the HC. And final approval on all other coaches.
So MATT WHO ELSE IS RESPONSIBLE?
Matt;2635203 said:What has he done? Except won 3 superbowls. Sure we won a playoff game ETC ETC ETC that all sports anchors pleasure themselves on saying, he has tried whatever it takes... He wants to win...
Matt;2635235 said:Who do I think the problem is? The entire coaching staff.
Matt;2635203 said:Ahh nevermind this post..
Matt;2635203 said:What has he done? Except won 3 superbowls. Sure we won a playoff game ETC ETC ETC that all sports anchors pleasure themselves on saying, he has tried whatever it takes... He wants to win... Ahh nevermind this post.. You guys that want him gone, want TO gone also, yet both are probably the most hungry on this team. TO/Jerry bashers love themselves some Wade and Campo, and average WR's.
Then there's the ridiculous "running back commitee" We can just bomb it to Austin because he's fast LMAO!!! Lets lose TO, lose Jerry, and have an unproven RB commitee approach and not have a proven winner in TO.
Matt;2635235 said:Who do I think the problem is? The entire coaching staff.
Matt;2635203 said:What has he done? Except won 3 superbowls. Sure we won a playoff game ETC ETC ETC that all sports anchors pleasure themselves on saying, he has tried whatever it takes... He wants to win... Ahh nevermind this post.. You guys that want him gone, want TO gone also, yet both are probably the most hungry on this team. TO/Jerry bashers love themselves some Wade and Campo, and average WR's.
Then there's the ridiculous "running back commitee" We can just bomb it to Austin because he's fast LMAO!!! Lets lose TO, lose Jerry, and have an unproven RB commitee approach and not have a proven winner in TO.
Matt;2635203 said:What has he done? Except won 3 superbowls. Sure we won a playoff game ETC ETC ETC that all sports anchors pleasure themselves on saying, he has tried whatever it takes... He wants to win... Ahh nevermind this post.. You guys that want him gone, want TO gone also, yet both are probably the most hungry on this team. TO/Jerry bashers love themselves some Wade and Campo, and average WR's.
Then there's the ridiculous "running back commitee" We can just bomb it to Austin because he's fast LMAO!!! Lets lose TO, lose Jerry, and have an unproven RB commitee approach and not have a proven winner in TO.
LittleD;2635428 said:Jerry Jones did not win 3 Super Bowls.... Jimmy, the Triplets, and the offensive line of thoses teams did. The proof is what has happened in all the years since those teams and coaches faded into the sunset. Next we have Jerry and Gailey and Jerry and 3 (5 wins/11 losses) seasons. Get the picture???
You guys keep standing up for TO like he is some kind of winner... He isn't...
He's a ME first stats hound that only cares about his REP and MONEY. He has left a tainted mark on 3 teams now and has never been a "TEAM" player. He only leads a team by divide and conquor methods. He has never led a team to the Super Bowl, but only been a role player who usually comes up way short in big, meaningful games. He boasts like an "All World Player" but his DROPS in big games are legendary. Why on earth do you guys keep proping him up. GEEZ!!!!
Until Jerry let's go of the reigns and brings in another Parcells type ( Hint Reeves) and turns over some authority of hiring and firing, I'm afraid we are doomed to more no playoff/no super bowl years.
:bang2:
Hostile;2635432 said:There are a multitude of problems not a singular problem. The problem that is Jerry Jones is directly proportional to the Head Coach. In 2007 when Parcells jumped ship long after the Super Bowl, Wade was probably the best candidate. He no longer fits that description. There are guys out there who are far better.
Royal Laegotti;2635441 said:I would change that to all authority. If he even has a say in who the water boy will be, we're doomed!
BraveHeartFan;2635452 said:Bingo. I agree with this totally. I like how everyone thinks Jerry picked Wade out of this huge pool of much better coaching talent at the time. That wasn't the case.
Wade was the best guy, at the time, because BP screwed him and this team by waiting so long to decide to leave. If he'd done it, quickly, Jerry could have had a shot at the whole coaching pool, rather than the shallow end of what was left.
However, now, the HC thing is totally on him cause he could have gotten rid of Wade this offseason and made a move for any number of people including Mike Shannahan and Bill Cowher.
Possibly that will be the move next offseason, I don't know.
I agree with you as well again. I do look forward to Stephen taking this thing over. From what I hear he will be much more level headed than his old man and willing to put competant management/coahing in place to run this thing. When that happens Jerry will be spinning in his grave!LittleD;2635453 said:I agree with your comment, but Jerry will not turn over control to anyone up and until he's on his death bed I fear. Maybe Stephen will be a different kind of owner. He's doesn't appear to be the attention magnet Jerry craves.
Matt;2635203 said:What has he done? Except won 3 superbowls. Sure we won a playoff game ETC ETC ETC that all sports anchors pleasure themselves on saying, he has tried whatever it takes... He wants to win... Ahh nevermind this post.. You guys that want him gone, want TO gone also, yet both are probably the most hungry on this team. TO/Jerry bashers love themselves some Wade and Campo, and average WR's.
Then there's the ridiculous "running back commitee" We can just bomb it to Austin because he's fast LMAO!!! Lets lose TO, lose Jerry, and have an unproven RB commitee approach and not have a proven winner in TO.