Why don't we...

[K-Mart]

run the 2 tackle formation that SD does with Columbo replacing a TE. We could put him next to one of the tackles. We could potentially have LA, Tucker, and Columbo lined up next to each other with Cambell in the backfield as a blocker. They hurt us and others with that formation. It would of helped on 3rd and 1 last week. Thoughts?

 

[AbeBeta]

Yes, our problem has been putting too few OL on the field.

 

[StevenOtero]

Yeah, Thomas formation works pretty good. Our HS uses it a lot. Dallas on the other hand needs all the help they can get. It sure wouldn't hurt us more.

 

[JBRockBottom31]

I was thinking the same thing this morning.

 

[AbeBeta]

Lookit. You guys are going to confuse Parcells.

First you want us to "open it up" -- then you want a very conservative approach with an extra OL.

How do you expect BP to learn anything from visiting here if we can't be consistent?

 

[Nors]

Lets go sign Tham

 

[Hostile]

run the 2 tackle formation that SD does with Columbo replacing a TE. We could put him next to one of the tackles. We could potentially have LA, Tucker, and Columbo lined up next to each other with Cambell in the backfield as a blocker. They hurt us and others with that formation. It would of helped on 3rd and 1 last week. Thoughts?

In the PC today Parcells basically said there are no plans to use Columbo much at all at this point.

Maybe it's time we stop finding ways to get him in the starting lineup?