Why Eagles Passed On WR Roy Williams... Not A Good WR

Messages
2,665
Reaction score
0
Why did the Eagles pass on Williams?

The Cowboys' newest receiver isn't all he's cracked up to be. Birds fans can just relax.

By Bob Brookover
Inquirer Staff Writer
Ladies and gentlemen, start your griping. Did you see what the Eagles didn't do now? The Detroit Lions put wide receiver Roy Williams on the trading block, and the Dallas Cowboys got him.
Why wouldn't the Eagles want a great wide receiver like Roy Williams?
Surely, the season that was written off and then resurrected by one wild weekend in the NFC East can be written off again.
Roy Williams and Terrell Owens on the same team? Commissioner Roger Goodell should just ship that Lombardi Trophy to Irving, Texas, right now.
Before this goes on any longer, let's get something straight: Roy Williams is not a great receiver.
He's a good receiver with the potential to be great who was mostly another first-round disappointment for a Lions franchise that has a patent on picking disappointing first-round wide receivers.
Granted, playing for the Lions is about as close as it gets to cruel and unusual punishment in the NFL, but there were reports that Williams had mentally checked out from playing in Detroit before officially checking out and heading to his home state of Texas on Tuesday.
Quitting on the job is inexcusable for a guy making $30,000 a year, let alone a guy who collected more than $16 million from his employer over the last five years.
That didn't stop old Jerry Jones from giving the Lions a first, third and sixth-round pick in next year's draft in order to be the only owner in the NFL with two players named Roy Williams. Jones also gave this Roy Williams a five-year contract extension that reportedly averages $9 million per season and includes $20 million in guaranteed money. That's more money overall and guaranteed than the Cowboys gave T.O. before this season. Ask T.O. who is better and guess what he'll tell you? And he's right to feel that way.
At the very least, the chemistry in Dallas is worth watching over these final 11 weeks because T.O. seems to be on edge lately anyway. Like it or not, Eagles coach Andy Reid believes good chemistry is almost as important as good players when it comes to building a successful team.
"We understand here how fragile a team can be," Reid said Monday. "This is a team sport, and if you bring people in that disrupt things, you realize exactly how fragile things are and you have to be careful with that. I'm not bringing T.O. into it . . . but I will say in general to maintain a football team you have to be aware of that, especially in a leadership position."
It should also be noted that the receiving Roy Williams had 17 catches for 232 yards and one touchdown this season for the 0-5 Lions. The Eagles' Hank Baskett has the same number of catches for 13 more yards and one more touchdown. The Eagles' Correll Buckhalter, who is a running back who barely touched the ball in two games this season, has the same amount of catches for 64 fewer yards and the same amount of touchdowns. Even Greg Lewis has only 28 fewer receiving yards than Williams this season.
This is not to suggest that Baskett, Buckhalter and Lewis are better than Williams. If you watched the former Texas star against the Eagles last season, you couldn't help but be impressed after he caught nine passes for 204 yards at Lincoln Financial Field.
But here's the thing about the Eagles: If you make an objective list as to why this team is off to a disappointing 3-3 start, it won't include problems at wide receiver.
That's somewhat remarkable, too, because the Eagles' top two receivers from a year ago - Kevin Curtis and Reggie Brown - have missed a combined nine games. Rookie DeSean Jackson, who, by the way, has more receiving yards than T.O., and contributions from Baskett, Lewis and Jason Avant have made the absences of Curtis and Brown negligible.
With Curtis and Brown both expected to return from injuries following the bye week, the Eagles will be above average at the wide receiver position.
Now if you really want to make a list as to why the Eagles are 3-3, you can probably start with the team's inability to convert in short-yardage situations near the goal line, the team's inability to consistently score touchdowns inside the red zone, kicker David Akers' struggle to hit long field goals, and a lack of production from the tight end position.
Roy Williams wasn't going to fix any of those problems.
Can the Eagles fix them?
Not sure about the short-yardage problem, although it didn't seem wise to release Tony Hunt rather than Lorenzo Booker. Hunt at least showed some signs that he could pick up a tough yard or two during his brief time here. Booker hasn't shown much of anything in six games.
As for the red zone and tight end production, that, too, could be a difficult problem to correct because it's something that has gone on for the last two seasons.
Akers, on the other hand, has a problem similar to the one that dogged Brett Myers in the middle of the Phillies' season. The analytical kicker has a strong enough leg to make long field goals, but he just can't aim them properly at the moment. If he could make just one from beyond 50 yards, he should be able to turn his season around.

Contact staff writer Bob Brookover at 215-854-2577 or bbrookover@phillynews.com.
 

kmd24

Active Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
0
Bk-Whistle.jpg
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,215
Reaction score
24,063
Guess their right, I would much rather have Hank Baskett, Reggie Brown, and Kevin Curtis. :lmao:
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
if they'd have got him, it would have been because of their astute scouting dept knowing about his unrealized potential.

They didnt get him because he didnt want to sign a deal there.
 

silver

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,871
Reaction score
1,696
poor eagles. first we steal TO and now Williams. They sure act like a scorned lover.

:suxiggle:
:tongue:
 

jcollins28

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,656
Reaction score
150
Doomsday101;2345948 said:
When did Philly become the great team at evaluating WR's?

Exactly a few football related terms that will never be used;

Super Bowl Champions, Philadelphia Eagles.

Eagles Hall Of Fame Wide Reciever.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
The thread title shouldn't say "Not A Good WR" when the article itself states "He's a good receiver."
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
But here's the thing about the Eagles: If you make an objective list as to why this team is off to a disappointing 3-3 start, it won't include problems at wide receiver.

You could say the same thing about the Cowboys. I'm still not sure about this trade from a need or compensation standpoint.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Doomsday101;2345948 said:
When did Philly become the great team at evaluating WR's?

Since today considering they have 5 future HoF WRs currently on their staff.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
Let me get this straight, they don't have problems at WR but cannot get into the endzone? Is throwing to a 5'-10" receiver in the redzone preferrable to one that is 6'-3"?
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Dallas did over pay for Roy Williams. Okay, now that we are past that. He is a very good receiver. He is better than Crayton, Austin and Hurd. That means that he will improve an already potent offense. It means that he will change the way defenses defend the Cowboys offense. The same would have been true had he gone to Philly or any other team that may be labeled a contender.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Also the Eagles are notoriously cheap. If they had traded for him, they would not have wanted to give him new money.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
superpunk;2345989 said:
Also the Eagles are notoriously cheap. If they had traded for him, they would not have wanted to give him new money.

They showed signs of not being as cheap last season by signing Samuels.
 

odog422

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
311
Firts, he names players on the eagles with marginally better stats at this point in the season in terms of more receptions and yards. But then he says, "this is not to say they are better than Roy Williams...."

So, what's the point in bringing up the numbers in the first place?
 

bsheeern

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,071
Reaction score
422
Well I can tell you this, The Eagles Wanted Roy Williams! They tried to get him.......
 
Top