Why is Brad Johnson on this team?

[coogrfan]

Except that he has a negative TD:INT ratio.

True. In fairness Johnson got very little help last week.

I'm not saying the guy is good, but the fact he didn't lose the game today should count for something.

 

[daynje]

It's not Johnson's fault we don't have any 8'5" WR's to catch those passes he throws.

 

[bbgun]

He didn't hurt us, but he wasn't the reason we won today. We "survived" him.

 

[ZeroClub]

He didn't hurt us, but he wasn't the reason we won today. We "survived" him.

Yeah. I think that's exactly right.

 

[coogrfan]

He didn't hurt us, but he wasn't the reason we won today. We "survived" him.

Agreed.

 

[BigDinAZ]

He played better, but i don't know how many more 5yd dump passes to barber I can take when it's 3rd & 17!!!!

 

[silver]

it's too late this year, but next year we have got to upgrade the backup qb spot. we need to bring in a younger guy and draft a developmental qb too. can't afford to risk the season with guys like johnson and bollinger (who sucks as much)

 

[David276]

there is no possible way brooks bollenger is worse than him.

 

[silver]

there is no possible way brooks bollenger is worse than him.

o yes he is. he's very limited physically and fumbles more often. we're royally screwed until Romo returns.

 

[bbgun]

I was shocked when Brad tried to hit TO on that semi-deep fly route in the 4th. The vast majority of his passes are within ten yards of the LOS.

 

[zeromaster]

I think Joimmy Johnson pointed out that for older QBs, their legs tend to go first, robbing them of their deep ball, not that Brad had one.

He definitely looks like he's playing the game at a slower pace than the receivers, and that delivery of his seems easier to block/tip passes on, as well as generally being behind the man on the crossing pattern.

But I'm just a fan...