Why is Marcus Spears still on the roster??

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
ajk23az;2621564 said:
I didn't say Spears was a stud. He is a solid player and not the JAG you make him out to be.

Do the stats show you how many times he occupied OL for a LBer to make the tackle? You are way to caught up in stats. Quite pathetic..

He actually had 35 tackles. 23 solo, 12 assists.

So...

Igor Olshansky? You think he is better than Spears right? According to his stats. he has 7 less tackles, 1 more sack, 1 less forced fumble, 2 less passes defensed.

Ty Warren? 3 more tackles, 1 more sack, 2 less passes defensed

Trevor Pryce? 8 less tackles, 3.5 more sacks (4.5 total), 1 less forced fumble

THE only LE that was a complete stud last year was Aaron Smith from Pittsburgh...

He had 23 solo tackles. Fact. Sorry I'm not going to count the times he came rolling in while a man was already on his way down. Yeah Ty Warren and Igor had 1 more sack each...for a whopping total of 2 for the season. LOL. Nice attempt at excusing mediocricy. :laugh2:

Look, all I'm saying is he has turned out to be a bonafide bust. Sorry.
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2621596 said:
Here's here to piss off people who don't understand football.

Oh I understand the game quite well as I actually played it, just as you did.
Spears is adequate. Certainly nothing special and not worth what we burnt on drafting him or paying him.
Please do not mischaracterize me going forward.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
JimDandy;2621759 said:
Oh I understand the game quite well as I actually played it, just as you did.
Spears is adequate. Certainly nothing special and not worth what we burnt on drafting him or paying him.
Please do not mischaracterize me going forward.
It's called being a DE in a 3-4 scheme.

If you that measure role by stats...you don't understand the game.

It's really just that simple.
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
dbair1967;2621635 said:
I'm PO'd at other news now anyway. Why dont you ban that troll.

What is your problem? I'm not high on Spears and post as much and you call for my banning???!!! :confused: Sheesh. This is one rough crowd.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,403
Reaction score
7,926
JimDandy;2621759 said:
Oh I understand the game quite well as I actually played it, just as you did.
Spears is adequate. Certainly nothing special and not worth what we burnt on drafting him or paying him.
Please do not mischaracterize me going forward.

then maybe you should stay in character?
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2621769 said:
It's called being a DE in a 3-4 scheme.

If you measure role that by stats...you don't understand the game.

It's really just that simple.

I understand the 3-4 fine. I have no problem with the lack of sacks, that's understandable. The lack of tackles though? Sorry I'm not giving him a free pass in this area.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
JimDandy;2621727 said:
He had 23 solo tackles. Fact. Sorry I'm not going to count the times he came rolling in while a man was already on his way down. Yeah Ty Warren and Igor had 1 more sack each...for a whopping total of 2 for the season. LOL. Nice attempt at excusing mediocricy. :laugh2:

Look, all I'm saying is he has turned out to be a bonafide bust. Sorry.

YOu may have played the game but you should think about what you are saying before you spout off. By your standard, Olshansky and Warren are just 'adequate.' That is nonsense.
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
iceberg;2621787 said:
then maybe you should stay in character?

LOL. Maybe you are correct. I best march in "lockstep" around here are expect the worst. :rolleyes: Thanks for the chuckle.
Have a great evening.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,403
Reaction score
7,926
JimDandy;2621793 said:
LOL. Maybe you are correct. I best march in "lockstep" around here are expect the worst. :rolleyes: Thanks for the chuckle.
Have a great evening.

no problem. you can go finish scraping off the burn marks now. : )
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
FuzzyLumpkins;2621790 said:
YOu may have played the game but you should think about what you are saying before you spout off. By your standard, Olshansky and Warren are just 'adequate.' That is nonsense.

Never did I say Olshansky and Warren are "adequate". I can turn that around and state using some of your all's standards, Spears is just as good as Olshansky and Warren. That is utter nonsense as well. :laugh2:
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
iceberg;2621799 said:
no problem. you can go finish scraping off the burn marks now. : )

Iceberg
Posts: 18,212

Goodness gracious, are you logged on here 24/7 breaking in visitors who have less than 500 posts to their name? :bow:
 

DuaneThomas71

Benched
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
He didn't play the run very well from what I saw, either. He was largely responsible for the meltdown against the Ravens, too.

I think it stems from poor technique. He doesn't really use his hands well...he seems to do too much twisting and get impatient.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
JimDandy;2621801 said:
Never did I say Olshansky and Warren are "adequate". I can turn that around and state using some of your all's standards, Spears is just as good as Olshansky and Warren. That is utter nonsense as well. :laugh2:
but he had better stats :bang2:
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
DuaneThomas71;2621812 said:
He didn't play the run very well from what I saw, either. He was largely responsible for the meltdown against the Ravens, too.

I think it stems from poor technique. He doesn't really use his hands well...he seems to do too much twisting and get impatient.

Finally, someone who has actually been paying attention! Well stated.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
JimDandy;2621801 said:
Never did I say Olshansky and Warren are "adequate". I can turn that around and state using some of your all's standards, Spears is just as good as Olshansky and Warren. That is utter nonsense as well. :laugh2:

You really don't have critical thinking skills. I'll number out the logic really simply for you.

1) Spears is inadequate because of his tackle stats.
2) Olshansky and Warren have less tackles.
3) Olshansky and Warren are inadequate.

Or are you going to try and flip flop again?
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,403
Reaction score
7,926
JimDandy;2621811 said:
Iceberg
Posts: 18,212

Goodness gracious, are you logged on here 24/7 breaking in visitors who have less than 500 posts to their name? :bow:

that's how i roll.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
JimDandy;2621759 said:
Spears is adequate. Certainly nothing special and not worth what we burnt on drafting him or paying him.

Do you have any idea what we're going to pay him next season?
 
Top