rcaldw
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,067
- Reaction score
- 1,181
I am one who was not happy about Henson going to NFLE despite the fact that I really want to see him get SOME KIND of action.
The negatives:
1. If he does well, even lights out well, there are plenty of people who will say it means nothing. And you know what is worst about that? They have a point. Rohan Davey is exhibit #1. We can also point to guys whose success there went on to prove genuine in the NFL, but the point is that nothing conclusive can be drawn from it.
2. If he does poorly for WHATEVER reason. I mean if he has no OL, no WR's and no running game, it won't matter. If Drew Henson does poorly it will solidify the whispers of him being a bust.
3. The talent, both against you and around you is less than what he faced in practice everyday.
4. It is like going through 2 training camps. Not exactly the best preparation for trying to play in the NFL in 2006.
For these reasons and a few others that I'm sure could be made, I just didn't think, and still don't, that it was a good thing for Henson.
The Positives:
1. It demonstrates, in my opinion, that the guy has a great attitude. "Whatever it takes to get better and to get to play".
2. It DOES get him into a competitive game atmosphere of some kind and he gets to play in games.
3. If he DOES do well, at least it has to be in the back of the minds of Cowboys brass that they MIGHT have a player here.
4. It showcases his talents to other teams if Henson ends up getting the opportunity to play elsewhere.
I don't think that he could afford to say no, yet, at the same time, I don't think it is the best thing for his career.
Forgetting the usual Romo versus Henson fight for a moment, do you agree with this analysis or not?
And crystal ball this for a second. Make a prediction. Look down the road 5 years. Will Drew Henson be able to say that he made a good choice?
The negatives:
1. If he does well, even lights out well, there are plenty of people who will say it means nothing. And you know what is worst about that? They have a point. Rohan Davey is exhibit #1. We can also point to guys whose success there went on to prove genuine in the NFL, but the point is that nothing conclusive can be drawn from it.
2. If he does poorly for WHATEVER reason. I mean if he has no OL, no WR's and no running game, it won't matter. If Drew Henson does poorly it will solidify the whispers of him being a bust.
3. The talent, both against you and around you is less than what he faced in practice everyday.
4. It is like going through 2 training camps. Not exactly the best preparation for trying to play in the NFL in 2006.
For these reasons and a few others that I'm sure could be made, I just didn't think, and still don't, that it was a good thing for Henson.
The Positives:
1. It demonstrates, in my opinion, that the guy has a great attitude. "Whatever it takes to get better and to get to play".
2. It DOES get him into a competitive game atmosphere of some kind and he gets to play in games.
3. If he DOES do well, at least it has to be in the back of the minds of Cowboys brass that they MIGHT have a player here.
4. It showcases his talents to other teams if Henson ends up getting the opportunity to play elsewhere.
I don't think that he could afford to say no, yet, at the same time, I don't think it is the best thing for his career.
Forgetting the usual Romo versus Henson fight for a moment, do you agree with this analysis or not?
And crystal ball this for a second. Make a prediction. Look down the road 5 years. Will Drew Henson be able to say that he made a good choice?