Why Romo is better than Prescott

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Prescott might have a better arm than Romo and he can certainly scramble better than Romo can or could ever.

And that really excited a lot of fans who don't know football well enough.

The reasons Tony Romo is such a good quarterback really evades a lot of minds out there. The first is the pre-read. Romo is a veteran QB, you would think that after the year we had last year, people would have learned to appreciate him more, but they were still ready to write him off at a rookie played well against vanilla defenses that weren't going 100 percent.

Romo is 10th in the league among active players in pass attempts... He knows how to read a defense both before the snap and after. His ability to extend the play differs greatly from Prescott's and we saw that on full display Sunday, where Prescott would extend the play but without greatly positive results. When Romo extends the play, he is still reading the defense. When players get open Romo delivers the ball. It means first downs instead of punting and it means touchdowns instead of field goals.

The recipe to our success in 2014 was the fact that we had an extremely high 3rd down completion percentage and Romo was excellent in the second half.

People are saying Dak was decent for a rookie. That isn't the case. He had a 69.4 quarterback rating, which could have been worse on the high balls he threw that could have been picked off, but worse was the fact that his second quarter QB rating was 52.2...

Dak started struggling in the second quarter, and Garrett in all of his genius started passing the ball more rather than running it. Even when we had the lead in the 4th. Garrett has no experience with a rookie quarterback and it shows. The guy has no idea what he is doing. He thinks he is the smartest guy in the room, but anyone could have told you that Dak should have had 20 or fewer attempts this game instead of 45...

Dak needs time to grow, but Garrett is always going to be this team's Achille's heel, especially without Romo to save his bacon. How he thought it would be appropriate to play his sacred cow in that 3rd preseason game is beyond me.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
Experience! Seeing a bunch of different coverages and knowing some defensive tendencies.
Dak can eventually gain the experience, but it takes time.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,354
Reaction score
51,350
I don't think anybody is saying that Prescott is better than Romo. The problem is Tony's age and health. I still can't believe some think Dak should play like a 10 year veteran.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,847
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I'm not really sure, because I just skimmed over it, was this about Romo being better than Dak because Garrett want's Romo to save his job with Jerry? You just might have something there!
(im getting dizzy)
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
We miss Romo the most in the redzone and in the clutch moments

While this is true, I think that oversimplification. That is where Romo's absence is highlighted, but where we miss him is throughout the game. The respect he demands from a defense, his ability to consistently move the chains. His ability to check out of plays when alternative plays are better suited to beat out a defense.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,838
Reaction score
20,694
Dak played fine, we already have a thread discussing why his rating here means nothing. It's a raw statistic and you should know better than to go off it. Stop.

Secondly, who the hell even needs it explained to them why Romo is better for this team than Dak? Way to talk down to a fan base. You can make as many threads as you want, but this is probably one of the most unneeded threads I've seen in some time here.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
I don't think anybody is saying that Prescott is better than Romo. The problem is Tony's age and health. I still can't believe some think Dak should play like a 10 year veteran.

Many people said that the "Dak era" should begin and that Romo should retire... As a Cowboys fan that is a recipe for disaster. No one should have expected him to play like a 10 year veteran, but thought that he could outplay Romo. Suggested he might never see the field again. That displays a real lack of understanding of how good a quarterback Romo is.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Dak played fine, we already have a thread discussing why his rating here means nothing. It's a raw statistic and you should know better than to go off it. Stop.

Secondly, who the hell even needs it explained to them why Romo is better for this team than Dak? Way to talk down to a fan base. You can make as many threads as you want, but this is probably one of the most unneeded threads I've seen in some time here.

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/what-if-dak-starts-the-season-6-2.355018/
 

BHendri5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
1,417
Prescott might have a better arm than Romo and he can certainly scramble better than Romo can or could ever.

And that really excited a lot of fans who don't know football well enough.

The reasons Tony Romo is such a good quarterback really evades a lot of minds out there. The first is the pre-read. Romo is a veteran QB, you would think that after the year we had last year, people would have learned to appreciate him more, but they were still ready to write him off at a rookie played well against vanilla defenses that weren't going 100 percent.

Romo is 10th in the league among active players in pass attempts... He knows how to read a defense both before the snap and after. His ability to extend the play differs greatly from Prescott's and we saw that on full display Sunday, where Prescott would extend the play but without greatly positive results. When Romo extends the play, he is still reading the defense. When players get open Romo delivers the ball. It means first downs instead of punting and it means touchdowns instead of field goals.

The recipe to our success in 2014 was the fact that we had an extremely high 3rd down completion percentage and Romo was excellent in the second half.

People are saying Dak was decent for a rookie. That isn't the case. He had a 69.4 quarterback rating, which could have been worse on the high balls he threw that could have been picked off, but worse was the fact that his second quarter QB rating was 52.2...

Dak started struggling in the second quarter, and Garrett in all of his genius started passing the ball more rather than running it. Even when we had the lead in the 4th. Garrett has no experience with a rookie quarterback and it shows. The guy has no idea what he is doing. He thinks he is the smartest guy in the room, but anyone could have told you that Dak should have had 20 or fewer attempts this game instead of 45...

Dak needs time to grow, but Garrett is always going to be this team's Achille's heel, especially without Romo to save his bacon. How he thought it would be appropriate to play his sacred cow in that 3rd preseason game is beyond me.


Yes there is a lot of knuckleheads that think dak is better, the only thing he has is youth and time to grow. Romo is one of the top 3 QBs in my opinion. Dak's 69.. is a good rating and he did play well for a rookie. Garrett is not the achilles heel of this team , he is the reason this team is as good as it is right now and the reason it will be even better
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,838
Reaction score
20,694
Rookie QB week 1 starts

Russel Wilson - 62.5
Andrew Luck - 52.9
Andy Dalton - 102.4 (Against Cleveland Browns)
Cam Newton - 110.4
Derek Carr - 94.7 (Want to see why going by raw statistics is dumb? Go watch his debut)
Jameis Winston - 64.5
Marcus Mariota - 158.3
Teddy Bridgewater - 83.3
Blake Bortles - 82.5
Ryan Tannehill - 39.0

So, out of the recent QBs that are now considered franchise QBs, 5 out of the 10 went on to have "bad" first starts to average. This overreaction is getting ridiculous now, it's Wednesday and 4 days removed from the game against the Giants. It was week 1. The emotion should be gone and you should be coming to your senses.

Dak played fine, Romo is better for us, defense is trash, offensive line needs to win in the run game. /thread
 
Last edited:

goshan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,656
Reaction score
888
Not just experience.

from what I have seen so far, romo in his prime was better at pocket presence and stepping side to side to avoid the rush (quickness and instincts). Arm strength looks similar but Romo has more accuracy and a faster release.
 
Top