Why you should say NO to Sammy Watkins

rkell87

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,443
Reaction score
880
I was listing Dez at 6-3 when making that list. I've seen him listed at both 6-2 and 6-3.

google, wikipedia, nfl.com, nfl combine, espn, OK State, pro-football reference, and yahoo sports all say say 6'2"

maybe stay on the first page of google next time
 

the_h0wey

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
2,228
This will be a dissenting opinion but I am not a fan of Marquise Lee and Sammy Watkins as opposed to Mike Evans and Kelvin Benjamin.

13 of the top 16 WRs last year were 6-3 or taller. The days of the smaller quicker receiver being a true #1 are over. Even a 6-1 guy like Watkins is ok as a #2 but not worth a top 10 pick IMO.

The reason Seattle has the best secondary? They're the biggest so they can match up best.


I don't think I have heard anyone say they didn't think Watkins was going to be an absolute stud. You don't think Seattle's pass rush has something to do with why their secondary has had success? I don't buy into they are the best because they are the biggest.
 
Top