Muhast
Newo
- Messages
- 7,661
- Reaction score
- 368
"Dallas Cowboys
Overrated: Williams is a good player when near the line of scrimmage, but he can't be called a top-tier safety because he struggles so much in coverage. He's a decent, not great player. His reputation would lead you to believe he was great. "
How come he cant be considered a great safety b/c he isnt the best at covering?
Thats like saying Peyton Manning isnt a great qb b/c he cant scramble at all and thats something a qb should be able to do some(rolls eyes).... or Emmitt Smith wasnt great b/c he didnt have lots of receptions... or Tiki Barber isnt good b/c he's not a power back...
Does nobody realize you can be great at what you do and that makes you great at that position? Roy is the most dominating safety near the box in the league.... he doesnt have to cover well, he isn't a coverage safety. He is meant to reak havok near the line..
Peyton Manning doesnt have to scramble bc he has great awareness and arm. He doesnt have to be a scrambler.
Tiki Barber doesnt have to be a power back, he is a balanced back. Thats what makes him so good, he can run and catch.
The media tends to overlook that Williams is a SS, and not meant to be covering Wr's one on one all that often. His role in the defense is what it is. He doesnt have to be great in coverage we just need a fs who is. Coverage is just one part of being a safety. Reading the field, sure tackler, awareness, mid range coverage, run stopping are all other parts of that.
So by the medias perception that since he has one downfall(that is made to be a lot worse than it is) he isnt great., he is "decent". So a runningback who can juke, who can break tackles, who is fast is just decent b/c they cant catch well? A WR who can catch, score td's and make big plays is decent b/c they cant block well?(randy moss anyone? everyone says he's great)
Overrated: Williams is a good player when near the line of scrimmage, but he can't be called a top-tier safety because he struggles so much in coverage. He's a decent, not great player. His reputation would lead you to believe he was great. "
How come he cant be considered a great safety b/c he isnt the best at covering?
Thats like saying Peyton Manning isnt a great qb b/c he cant scramble at all and thats something a qb should be able to do some(rolls eyes).... or Emmitt Smith wasnt great b/c he didnt have lots of receptions... or Tiki Barber isnt good b/c he's not a power back...
Does nobody realize you can be great at what you do and that makes you great at that position? Roy is the most dominating safety near the box in the league.... he doesnt have to cover well, he isn't a coverage safety. He is meant to reak havok near the line..
Peyton Manning doesnt have to scramble bc he has great awareness and arm. He doesnt have to be a scrambler.
Tiki Barber doesnt have to be a power back, he is a balanced back. Thats what makes him so good, he can run and catch.
The media tends to overlook that Williams is a SS, and not meant to be covering Wr's one on one all that often. His role in the defense is what it is. He doesnt have to be great in coverage we just need a fs who is. Coverage is just one part of being a safety. Reading the field, sure tackler, awareness, mid range coverage, run stopping are all other parts of that.
So by the medias perception that since he has one downfall(that is made to be a lot worse than it is) he isnt great., he is "decent". So a runningback who can juke, who can break tackles, who is fast is just decent b/c they cant catch well? A WR who can catch, score td's and make big plays is decent b/c they cant block well?(randy moss anyone? everyone says he's great)