Howboutdemcowboys31
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,042
- Reaction score
- 9,308
Honest question because I don't follow college players until DC.com starts their draft show. Excited about the pick.
Honest question because I don't follow college players until DC.com starts their draft show. Excited about the pick.
Honest question because I don't follow college players until DC.com starts their draft show. Excited about the pick.
Top 58 though?No, he’s not strong enough against the run.
Based on talent alone he wasn’t a top 50 player for me and a good amount of analysts.
David Irving would have, too.Honest question because I don't follow college players until DC.com starts their draft show. Excited about the pick.
I can see where you're coming from, but he's basically going to do what he does best from Marinelli.The production was just not there.
He did well to go where he did.
I don’t like we see anything from this player until year 3. He’s a project.
On the field, Hill was the definition of a disruptor. The stat sheet notes only one sack a season ago, but Hill’s impact was far more than that. His 11.6% pressure rate was the 11th-best figure among defensive tackles in the FBS last season. He ranked higher than guys like Ed Oliver, Jeffery Simmons, and Dre’Mont Jones in that statistic last season. This was not an unproductive player, but rather one who didn’t see the field enough to put up great raw stats.
Top 58 though?
We don't ask the 3 tech to be a run stopper.Not for me. I saw him as a 3rd/4th rounder.
I love the traits as a nickel rusher, but don't see him as a complete DT. DTs that can effect the run and pass coming out are top 50/70 selections for me.