Would Romo have us at 5-0?

[cowboybish]

So open for debate. Would Romo in his prime have us at 5-0 with this current team?

 

[HungryLion]

I could see the argument for 4-1.

But probably not 5-0.

Romo had an occasional high turnover game. Romo also didn’t play defense to stop the Packers from scoring 34 points.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

So open for debate. Would Romo in his prime have us at 5-0 with this current team?

With this team around him......YES!

 

[Arkyvarminter]

Could he fill in for Tyron Smith?

 

[Ranched]

 

[America's Cowboy]

Just a matter of time before the "Romo would do better" threads start.

 

[Asklesko]

I think so. He had a lot of magic to bring us back or put us over in close games. More than Dak.

 

[The Fonz]

with this team? without doubt

 

[eromeopolk]

So open for debate. Would Romo in his prime have us at 5-0 with this current team?

No he would have been injured in the preseason game. Manning said Romo always wanted to be a TV analyst and not a QB.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

No. The same problems that plagued Romo’s teams plague Dak’s. It’s not the quarterback.

 

[HungryLion]

No. The same problems that plagued Romo’s teams plague Dak’s. It’s not the quarterback.

Bingo

 

[boysfanperiod]

Do you have a time machine? Because I don't have a time machine. It is too late.

Honestly, why do we always have to do this? Would Aikman be 5-0 with this team? Would Staubach? Gosh, this stuff gets tiring. We have the current team we have. Perhaps, some are just nostalgic.

Honestly, I don't know. Whomever said 4-1. I would go with that.

 

[Corso]

With this defense? No.

 

[Corso]

With this team around him......YES!

Take your lips off the teet.

Go ahead... call me a Dak-Zoid again.
Never defended the dude in my life, but why not, right?

 

[CT Dal Fan]

We might have won the Saints game with Tony. He was awesome at two minute drills and could have led a field goal drive late (assuming Brett Maher would have made it).

But the Packers game was lost by the defense, no matter how poorly Dak may or may not have played.

 

[John813]

Mike White would have this team at 16-0 at this point

 

[Irvin88_4life]

How many times in Romo's career did he have a 5-0 start? Once and that's it. How many times did Romo have 11 straight wins? None but Dak does.

These are stupid threads talking about what Romo would have done or could have done. He failed, often. In the playoffs, in week 17 games when he needed a win to make the plays he came up empty. Let it go, Romo isn't a Hall of Fame QB and it isn't coming back. His time is gone

 

[Irvin88_4life]

We might have won the Saints game with Tony. He was awesome at two minute drills and could have led a field goal drive late (assuming Brett Maher would have made it).

But the Packers game was lost by the defense, no matter how poorly Dak may or may not have played.

Dak has been decent in 2 minute drills, let's not act like Romo always made a 2 minute drive. He lost plenty of games including ones that ended because he threw a pick.

 

[catiii]

With Romo there was always hope. (I only remember one other like that - Staubach.)
so yeah, I think we'd be at least 4-1 because of the IT factor which happens to be an intangible.

 

[Bobhaze]

No. Plus he would have been hurt and lost for the season by now anyway.