VCDefectors
Benched
- Messages
- 1,080
- Reaction score
- 1
There's no question in my mind that the secondary isn't going to get that much better until Henry is ready to start. Would you sit him out this week to get him ready for the Packers game?
zeroburrito;1778928 said:if he can't play this week he wont be ready next week. need him to play and get into football mode.
air0208;1778956 said:The OP was asking if we should sit him against the Jets, which he probably will be ready for. But even if he is ready, since the Jets dont have much of an offense, should we sit him and give him almost 1.5 weeks of a break so he gets back for the most important game of the season.
IMO, yes, we should rest him, we can win w/o him.
whitey_aw;1778962 said:I think if Coles doesn't play, there is really no need for Henry to play. We can double Cotchery with Reeves and safety help, and Newman should be able to shut down whoever else they start with Coles out.
I think rest is the only thing that will get Henry back to 100%. No need to risk aggravating the injury if we don't need him.
zeroburrito;1778985 said:the Commanders wr's are even worse than the jets. look what they did. they have been PUTRID all year.
burmafrd;1779153 said:Moss and company abused Reeves pretty good. BUT the Jets do not have the same quality of WRs - not that the Skins WRs are really that good- so I say yes REST Henry and let his ankle heal some more.
Oh the irony...eduncan22;1779156 said:Get the picture.
eduncan22;1779189 said:
Reeves is a good 3rd corner.
VCDefector;1778916 said:There's no question in my mind that the secondary isn't going to get that much better until Henry is ready to start. Would you sit him out this week to get him ready for the Packers game?
Reeves is a decent CB and is getting better and I hope he can be a great CB with some seasoning.eduncan22;1779189 said:
Reeves is a good corner.