Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,535
- Reaction score
- 44,990
Pretty impressive, especially w/o 6 games missed 2017........
Don't know where he's getting his numbers.
Pretty impressive, especially w/o 6 games missed 2017........
+1, its hard to know what "first 2 seasons" means here, he probably should have done the comparisons in each of their first 32 games for a more accurate comparison
Pretty impressive, especially w/o 6 games missed 2017........
Landry really babied Dorsett, he didnt start until game 6 or 7 and Newhouse got most of the carries in the first playoff game.
Landry stubbornly didn't play Dorsett much his rookie year. They also didn't use Emmitt much his rookie year on a team just finding its way.
Zeke, on the other hand, inherited the best offensive line in football, and they gave him a full load from Day 1.
Smith had a great O line. And if you look at the passing numbers they were much lower compared to this era. They ran the ball more.Total yards are a joke. Did Emmit have as good of an O line as Zeke? No.
Not saying Zeke won’t be as good or better as Emmit but this statistic is one of the worst in football.
Don't believe Dorsett or Smith were featured runners from Week 1 of their rookie seasons like Zeke was.
And Dickerson had 3,913 by my count. Don't know where he's getting his numbers.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DickEr00.htm
I think it is pretty straight forward what he means by "first 2 seasons". He got the numbers correct for the running backs he listed except for Dickerson.
Pretty impressive, especially w/o 6 games missed 2017........