BEWARE: nothing gets by the FAA

Discussion in 'Off-topic Zone' started by Signals, Mar 9, 2008.

  1. Signals

    Signals Suspicious looking stranger

    4,653 Messages
    31 Likes Received
    "Roland Herwig, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, said the twin-engine aircraft was traveling from Oklahoma City to Mankato, Minn., when it went down about five miles southwest of the airport. Herwig said then preliminary indications were that at least one person was on board"
    Ya think??!! MAN, those guys are SMART!! :bang2:
  2. Cajuncowboy

    Cajuncowboy Preacher From The Black Lagoon

    27,476 Messages
    3 Likes Received
    I know someone with the FAA. This doesn't surprise me at all.
  3. DallasFanSince86

    DallasFanSince86 Pessimism Sucks

    2,056 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Now that is one of the stupidest comments I have ever seen.
  4. DallasCowpoke

    DallasCowpoke Fierce Allegiance

    5,533 Messages
    300 Likes Received
    Actually, the statement simply means that they can only confirm that one occupant was on-board the aircraft at impact, and they would not, or could not confirm if other occupants left the aircraft prior to that.

    It is possible for an aircraft to crash without anyone on-board you realize, right? Or have they not gotten to that chapter in "As a pilot in training" school yet?
  5. Duane

    Duane Well-Known Member

    6,963 Messages
    141 Likes Received
    Dude could have had a parachute and bailed before it crashed. Therefore letting the plane crash with no one on board.

Share This Page