News: BTB: Cowboys Preseason Game One Review, Position Battles: Thoughts On Offensive Line

Discussion in 'News Zone' started by w8lifter, Aug 17, 2012.

  1. w8lifter

    w8lifter Active Member

    571 Messages
    96 Likes Received
    Cowboys Preseason Game One Review, Position Battles:
    Thoughts On The Offensive Line Situation

    The 2012 Cowboys and the 90s teams both feature unheralded LGs
    named Nate. Coincidence? I think not. More photos ยป

    This offseason, many of us were disappointed in the Cowboys' failure to fortify the interior of the offensive line in free agency or to spend a high draft pick on the likes of a David DeCastro. This last week's offensive struggles, which all begin with Dallas' makeshift line, have allowed an army of naysayers to crawl out of their little cubbies to offer a resounding chorus of doomsday prophecies and "I told you so's".

    In response, I'd like to remind you of the Cowboys lines in the 90s, to whom shortsighted historians have given the lion's share of credit for Emmitt Smith's extended greatness. Listening to this revisionist history, one might be led to believe that the team started five first-round draft picks, with a couple of seconds and thirds as backups. Perhaps a bit of real history is in order. I want to focus on the 92-93 Cowboys, who boasted the league's most feared running game, so it's safe to say that their offensive line was in good working order. They were, in fact, a fearsome bunch.

    But they weren't made up of particularly high draftees. Across the front were LT Mark Tuinei, a UDFA initially brought to camp in 1983 as a defensive tackle; LG Nate Newton, another UDFA who had bounced around the league for a couple of seasons before settling in Dallas (where he stuck largely because they Cowboys were so desperate on the O-line), center Mark Stepnoski, a 1989 third-rounder; RG John Gesek, a tenth-round draft choice by the Raiders in 1987 whom the Cowboys picked up as a "plan B" free agent prior to the 1990 season, and RT Erik Williams, taken in the third round in 1991. In 1993, Gesek gave way to Kevin Gogan, who the Cowboys took in the 1987 draft's eighth round. In 1993, Stepnoski was injured in week 13, and Gesek took over at center for the remainder of the season and the Super Bowl run.

    A strong argument can be made that Williams was the only physical specimen of the group. The rest were undersized (Stepnoski and, to a degree Gesek), or physically limited (Tuinei, Newton and Gogan). Yet they became one of the best offensive lines in recent memory, clearing the way for the NFL's leading rusher three consecutive years (1991-93), and doing a solid job keeping Troy Aikman clean (although he was sacked 23 and 26 times in 1992 and '93, respectively).

    Read more after the jump...


    To my mind, the poster children for those offensive lines were the right guards, John Gesek and Kevin Gogan. As we've seen, neither guy had much of a pedigree. As eighth- and tenth-round selections, neither would have been chosen in today's seven-round draft system. Think about this for a moment: as much as we decry the Cowboys' lack of investment in the offensive line in recent years, four of the top six guys on those dominant 92-93 lines would have been UDFAs; the other two were third rounders.

    I have long felt that Jerry Jones's mental model of the ideal team makeup is derived from those teams. Because the 90s Cowboys managed to create a dominant line without investing a slew of high draft picks, I believe Jerry doesn't believe it's necessary - or a wise allocation of draft picks - to do so. Clearly, a dominant line can be built by using reclaimed and salvaged materials. So, what has kept them from engineering a repeat?

    I think its the offensive line coach. The Cowboys offensive line coach from 1989 to 1992 was Tony Wise, an energetic and meticulous teacher who deserves a lot of credit for the team's early-90s turnaround. He took a bunch of fringe players and, working with strength coach Mike Woicik, made them into Pro Bowlers. Sound familiar?

    But here's the rub: Wise needed three years to work his magic. And the improvement didn't follow a steady upward curve; there were some scary weeks in which they regressed badly. In week three of the 1991 season, for example, the Eagles came to town and completely dominated the Cowboys in a 24-0 win, reserving a specially potent can of whoopass for the offensive line: by the final gun, the Cowboys had managed only 90 total yards and Aikman had been sacked eleven times (!!) for a total of 67 yards in losses. Pundits loudly proclaimed that Aikman was never going to survive behind this line, and all but dismissed Dallas' chances. But that proved more an aberration than the norm; ultimately, the team finished with the league's leading rusher and receiver and, in terms of completion percentage, its second-rated passer.

    In 2012, it's clear the Cowboys are banking on a similar O-line transformation, one based on superb coaching more than elite draft status. In Bill Callahan, I think Jason Garrett has his Tony Wise, a coach capable, over time, of molding free agent types into a strong, and perhaps even dominant, unit. Indeed, watching Bill Callahan work with the offensive linemen throughout camp, I'm reminded of Wise, both in terms of his pedagogical acumen and work ethic, and the staggering size of his task: this line has a lot of work to do, but it has the guys to make it happen.

    How might we handicap the offensive line position battles? A few scattered thoughts:

    We know who the starters are: Unless a Pro-Bowl interior lineman in his prime comes free and agrees to a below-market contract, I think the five starters are clear: Tyron Smith, Nate Livings, Phil Costa, Mackenzy Bernadeau, and Doug Free. What we don't know is when - or whether - they will cohere.

    The tackles are (mostly) set: Smith and Free are backed up by Jermey Parnell, an athletic project who is progressing and has looked pretty good in camp, and acquitted himself well against the Raiders. The burning question here is whether they will retain Pat McQuistan as the other backup OT. Parnell can play the "swing," so it's possible McQ could be a casualty, especially if they bring in a backup center. If they don't I think he'll stick, as he's been taking an increasing number of center snaps. In his first tour of duty, he was a special teams regular. Combine that with backup RT and OC duty? That's a lot of bottom-of-the-roster versatility.

    Questions at guard: The gameday roster usually features a guard-center swing; David Arkin, who has probably received more training camp snaps than any other player - and at both positions - is the likely lad for such duty. Rookie UDFA Ronald Leary is another candidate, although he has leveled off in the last week, especially against interior quickness. Guys like Ratliff and Crawford give him fits. I can't see them keeping three backup guards, which portends a Derrick Dockery dismissal.

    The wild card: With Bill Nagy now officially out, the lone OC-OG swing candidate is Kevin Kowalski. Unfortunately, we haven't seen him because of tendinitis in his ankle. If "Killer K" can log some preseason time, he has a chance to claim that spot. Sadly, there has been no indication thus far that this might become a possibility; unlike other rehabbing players, he hasn't even been seen working with trainers on the sidelines. Assuming that he can't make it back in time, I see the O-line battle playing out something like this:

    OT: Smith, Free, Parnell, *McQuistan

    OG: Livings, Bernadeau, Arkin, Leary

    OC: Costa, *veteran backup. McQuistan

    As this suggests, the Cowboys will take only nine O-linemen. I'm basing this largely on the depth on the defensive front seven, where someone like Adrian Hamilton has more upside than a Dockery. If they only keep nine, then McQuistan is in a battle with someone currently on another NFL roster - a more solid backup OC option than anybody they have at present. Although Arkin can probably come in and play for a quarter, having him start at center for a stretch of regular season games is a scary prospect, and one I think it too terrifying for the Dallas coaching staff to contemplate. If I were a betting man, therefore, I'd place my hard-earned dough on another team's late cut, with McQ getting the boot.
    What do you think, BTBers? Love this list? Hate it with a passion? Then hit the comments section and let us know!
    Follow me @rabblerousr, follow Blogging The Boys on Twitter or like Blogging The Boys on Facebook
  2. w8lifter

    w8lifter Active Member

    571 Messages
    96 Likes Received
    I admit I have been very critcal of Jerry Jones annoying propensity for not paying much attention to drafting quality linemen.

    This author makes a VERY good argument for the chance that Jerry just MIGHT get lucky with his rag tag bunch of O-Linemen this season.

    However, the differences in the '90's Cowboys Offensive Linemen and the 2012 seasons O-Line is experience.

    The '90's O-Linemen had much more experience than the current O-Line squad.

    So, staying with my habit of being eternally optimistic, Im going to try to keep a 'W8 & See' attitude before I give up hope for this years squad.

    Now that I put myself out there for criticism, Im ready to hear what ya'll have to think about this comparison.

  3. CCBoy

    CCBoy Well-Known Member

    25,646 Messages
    6,389 Likes Received
    Hey W8, top of the day to you!:starspin

    I think that the team actually likes Pat McQuistan. I'm thinking that the team keeps him, just in case, for insurance at tackle. One injury, or Doug Free struggling mightily, and McQuistan becomes the 'swing' tackle quickly.

    It looks that the backup for center, could be retained in function, by the presence of Mackenzy Bernadeau. But I am looking for the slot to be filled by David Arkin, who is seen now as a G/OC. I don't think, unless a really nice target of opportunity is seen being waived, that a vet is brought in now.

    For a starter, I'm thinking that an in-house solution in backup depth, would be Harland Gunn/'killer' Kowalski on the Practice Squad.
  4. sbark

    sbark Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    5,093 Messages
    1,130 Likes Received
    Didnt the Cowboy's, in McQuistans 1st tour here, been a few yrs ago, work him also at the Guard position........not sure it was a successful expeirment and not sure he's done any since, but gives him even more flexibility along with special teams.......
  5. Dhragon

    Dhragon Deadly Claws of Death

    1,675 Messages
    675 Likes Received
    It says Wise took 3 years to get the line to gel. This would be Callahan's 1st so we need to wait another couple of years before we have a decent line? Fantastic!

  6. jnday

    jnday Well-Known Member

    8,622 Messages
    3,171 Likes Received
    McQuistan played the guard position for the Dolphins at different times.
  7. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member

    35,320 Messages
    15,074 Likes Received
    That is amazing
  8. HoosierCowboy

    HoosierCowboy Put Pearson in the HOF

    2,295 Messages
    276 Likes Received
    the point is, it takes time and continuity to build a line and not one preseason game!! new coach, new players, maybe give them another week or two?
  9. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,379 Likes Received
    The 90's O line was a once in a lifetime happening. Just happened that those players were in the same time at the same place. Certainly was not planned or anything like that.

    Jerruh thinks he can duplicate that by plan. That is his HUGE mistake.

    No one has built a great line since then with basically castoffs and low round picks.

    That should have clued him in that it was basically an accident. Not something that can be duplicated.
  10. Dhragon

    Dhragon Deadly Claws of Death

    1,675 Messages
    675 Likes Received
    Yeah, but if it takes 3 years like Wise, then by that time Romo will probably be past his prime, as will Ware and Witten. Great O-line plan if it works if you have a young QB but not one Romo's age.

Share This Page