So by your logic we should not make any changes to any laws or ways of thinking because if we do than it means we will HAVE to make more drastic changes for anyone that wants change. Come on give me a break. And if we should not make any changes to existing laws....but was it not a ban on gay marriages that was voted into law? So why did they feel the need to vote to ban gay marriages? I mean why change the law in the first place? Seems like they were doing something to make sure that gays could not get married. But by your logic should we not even allow the ban? Should we not allow a future vote to make an amendment to the Cali constitution in order to once again ban gay marriages?