I've been thinking about things with Miles Austin. Generally speaking, I think it makes perfect sense to designate him as a June 1st cut. But with that being said, if the front office can convince Austin to take a pay cut, that might be worth more to the team than cutting him and replacing him with another receiver (not evenly necessarily a 2nd receiver, but even a 5th receiver behind is going to cost us money). Ultimately, I think it would come down to how much of a pay cut he was willing to take, though I think many will argue that even if he is willing to take the veteran minimum that given his continued signing bonus money, and the fact that he could be a progress stopper would suggest that the time has simply come to move on from him and that the combination of Williams and Beasley being allowed to properly develop will take our offense to another level. With that being said, I could even see a scenario where we cut him and bring him back for something around the veteran minimum.