Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by WoodysGirl, Feb 22, 2013.
He has been doing that for 8 years, BALLIN and then throws a INT
what else is new?
Why wouldn't he?
Not as often as you might think.
He's probably played over 120 games and he has one of the better 4th quarter rating of any QB ever.
I don't think it's as bad as some of you think it is...obviously, or I'd want him gone by now.
But I do feel your pain. :starspin
I can tell you why he shouldn't
2. Interception Prone
3. He has accomplished nothing
do you really think anyone but fellow Romo haters listen to you?
dude, you cannot pass up UFCRULES as the #1 Romo hater so stop trying.
He shouldn't not get anything more than 3 years at his age
I will tell you why he should.
Flacco sets the market now. Until Rodgers signs his next big contract, this is how the market for QB contracts for the next few years will go.
There is no reason he should just take whatever restructure is offered to him because he is so glad to have a star on his helmet.
He could leave next year and have five-six teams running to sign him.
He frustrates me quite a bit, but I do not understand what exactly people expect him to do.
This means he, or more likely his agent, are intelligent and waiting for the market to set his value and then if he's willing, which he supposedly is, to do a deal that is fair to himself and the Cowboys.
It really has nothing to do with Flacco versus Romo. It is about the market being set because Flacco will set the bar.
Teams are going to rush to sign a QB with 1 playoff win?
Yes, they would rush to sign a QB who can stack meaningless stats like nobody's business.
Like him or not, you cannot deny Romo has been a prolific QB in this league.
How are they meaningless? Without Romo's crazy stats, the cowboys don't win many games.
The Cowboys have not won many games in the past 2 years:bang2:
I'm sure he meant in relation to getting to the playoffs and advancing.
Yes, without Romo we would be getting slaughtered the last couple of years.
Actually, the team's won-loss percentage is pretty decent with him at the helm. 55-38 is one of the better winning percentages in the league.
We all just want and expect more from the team, and some case, him too.
Kap - 2nd in defense (ppg) + 6th in rushing TDs
Luck - 21st in defense (ppg) + 18th in rushing TDs
Wilson - 1st in defense (ppg) + 9th in rushing TDs
RG3 - 22nd in defense (ppg) + 2nd in rushing TDs
Luck is also in the AFC South (Houston, Tennessee, Jacksonville) and played the AFC East.
Ice is cold as well
I done speculated this a few days ago.
It really isn't speculation - it is just obvious that you wait for Flacco to set the market as he's actually a UFA
Shut up and play, Romo.
Perfect example of throwing stuff at the wall and hoping it sticks as SD proved this wasn't true. Secondly, the convenient "he throws INT's'" is also a fallacy since Eli (3.2%) has a considerably higher INT percentage than Romo (2.8%).
Do I get it's about the rings? Absolutely. Do I get that some of you make blanket and reckless statements as to his ability that simply aren't true? Absolutely.
Third, you guys are going to want to jump off a building because the word from Mike Fisher is, is that Jerry knows knows there's only a handful of guys on this planet who can play the position anywhere near what Romo can and he has no intention of going into the dark ages with an unknown entity at QB at his age so you can forget a 3 year deal, it's going to be a 4-5 year deal with the hopes of finding someone to develop.
You wanna bet that Romo with some help on the offensive line and a running game won't win in the playoffs in five years. I'll take that bet...
If you survive the jump.:laugh1:
I am so sick of people on this board comparing Romo to QB's who had won A SB
He doesn't deserve Flacco money but he'll get some outrageous amount & be our guy till his legs fall off.