Global Warming may reduce the number of hurricanes that hit the United States

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by zrinkill, Sep 1, 2009.

  1. zrinkill

    zrinkill Diamond surrounded by trash

    34,344 Messages
    2,447 Likes Received
    Global warming could reduce the number of hurricanes that hit the United States, says a federal study that clashes with other research.

    The new study is the latest in a contentious scientific debate over how man-made global warming may affect the intensity and number of hurricanes.

    In it, researchers link warming waters, especially in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, to increased vertical wind shear in the Atlantic Ocean near the United States. Wind shear – a change in wind speed or direction – makes it hard for hurricanes to form, strengthen and stay alive.

    So that means, according to researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Miami Lab and the University of Miami, that “global warming may decrease the likelihood of hurricanes making landfall in the United States.”

    With every degree Celsius that the oceans warm, the wind shear increases by up to 16 kilometres an hour and impairs storm formation, study author Chunzai Wang, a research oceanographer at NOAA, said.
    Winds forming over the Pacific and Indian Oceans have global effects, much like El Niño does, he said.

    Dr. Wang said he based his study on observations rather than computer models and records of landfall hurricanes through more than 100 years.

    His study was published Wednesday in Geophysical Research Letters.

    Critics say Dr. Wang's study is based on poor data that were rejected by scientists on the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. They said that, at times, only one in 10 North Atlantic hurricanes hits the U.S. coast and that the data reflect only a small percentage of storms around the globe.

    Hurricanes hitting land “are not a reliable record” for how hurricanes have changed, said Kevin Trenberth, climate analysis chief for the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.

    Dr. Trenberth is among those on the other side of a growing debate over global warming and hurricanes. Each side uses different sets of data and focus on different details.

    One group of climate scientists has linked increases in the strongest hurricanes – those with winds greater than 209 kilometres an hour – in the past 35 years to global warming. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said “more likely than not,” manmade global warming has already increased the frequency of the most intense storms.

    Hurricane researchers, especially scientists at NOAA's Miami Lab, have argued, however, that the long-term data for all hurricanes show no such trend.

    And Dr. Wang's new research suggests just the opposite of the view that more intense hurricanes result from global warming. The Miami faction points to a statement by an international workshop on tropical cyclones that says “no firm conclusion can be made on this point.”

    Former U.S. National Hurricane Center director Max Mayfield said that, regardless of which side turns out to be right, it only takes one storm to be deadly. So the key for residents of hurricane-prone areas, he said, is to be prepared for a storm “no matter what.”

  2. CowboyDan

    CowboyDan Anger is a Gift

    3,410 Messages
    139 Likes Received

    :moonbart: :moon: And you said you didn't do useless posts.
  3. burmafrd

    burmafrd Benched

    43,820 Messages
    3,379 Likes Received
    Maybe you should take your own advice.
  4. zrinkill

    zrinkill Diamond surrounded by trash

    34,344 Messages
    2,447 Likes Received
  5. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    85,716 Messages
    8,420 Likes Received
    So I guess you could say this is pretty much guessing science. One day we are going to have several and more powerful and now maybe we will have fewer. Pretty neat to guess and not be held accountable for being wrong in the 1st place and we are suppose to pass legislation that could affect our economy based on this vague science?

Share This Page