1. Are you a gamer? Come join us at GameNotOver.com
    If you are a gamer, then GameNotOver is your new home! Whether you are a PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, mobile or web gamer, you will find other gamers to talk with on GameNotOver where you can get help, share reviews of the latest games and gaming technology or even wax nostalgic over the gaming days of old. Come join us and help us grow GameNotOver into a wonderful community for gamers!
    Dismiss Notice

Twitter: Interesting Jason Garrett W-L stat

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by lqmac1, Oct 31, 2013.

  1. lqmac1

    lqmac1 Well-Known Member

    1,743 Messages
    1,144 Likes Received
    “@Edwerderespn: In Jason Garrett's full seasons as HC, Cowboys 16-1 vs teams finishing below .500 (T1-NFL) but 4-19 vs teams finishing .500 or better (T28)”
     
    Duane likes this.
  2. StarBoyz83

    StarBoyz83 Well-Known Member

    8,897 Messages
    3,576 Likes Received
    Good thing garretts here another 2 seasons! oh wait
     
  3. bbailey423

    bbailey423 Well-Known Member

    5,870 Messages
    1,797 Likes Received
    What happens when you add 1st and close to last together and take the average. You get AVERAGE. You get the middle. You get 8-8. And guess what...SURPRISE SURPRISE....that is what we are!
     
    pjtoadie, djmajestik and stasheroo like this.
  4. CATCH17

    CATCH17 1st Round Pick

    36,804 Messages
    14,257 Likes Received
    It's because we're so basic that when we can't out-athlete a team we're sure as heck are not going to out scheme a team.
     
  5. stasheroo

    stasheroo Well-Known Member

    29,241 Messages
    12,782 Likes Received
    Yeah. Glad Werder has caught up to what we've been saying around here for over a year now.

    That's why he gets paid the big bucks!

    Well, that and the mustache...
     
  6. stasheroo

    stasheroo Well-Known Member

    29,241 Messages
    12,782 Likes Received
    Great deal of truth here.
     
  7. Denim Chicken

    Denim Chicken Well-Known Member

    5,957 Messages
    4,883 Likes Received
  8. bbailey423

    bbailey423 Well-Known Member

    5,870 Messages
    1,797 Likes Received
    You are right about that. It worked in the 90s...Irvin was just bigger and more physical than anyone who tried to cover him. The OL was bigger than everyone they blocked. And it did not take much to score points. If you think about it....when guys catch the football in Dallas....they are rarely wide open. There no busted coverages. The coverage teams employ on us are to simple for them to bust. Which means Romo has to fit the ball in tight windows. Which also means are receivers are going to have to make a tough catch AND endure a physical beating becaue multiple defenders are in the vicinity of every catch.
     
    Afigueroa22 likes this.
  9. AdamJT13

    AdamJT13 Salary Cap Analyst

    16,158 Messages
    3,424 Likes Received
    Stats like this are skewed because many teams are in the 7-9 win category each year. If you beat them, it's more difficult for them to finish above .500. If you lose to them, they're more likely to finish .500 or better. In other words, two of your opponents could be equal and go 7-8 against the rest of the league, but which one of the categories they end up in depends only on whether you beat them.
     
  10. dallasdave

    dallasdave Well-Known Member

    18,300 Messages
    38,637 Likes Received
    Hey Adam, when are you going to post some more cap info?
     
  11. Bigdog24

    Bigdog24 Well-Known Member

    2,651 Messages
    829 Likes Received

    That screams on BIG obvious thing......the Cowboys Coach is not in the same league with the big boys.... Wonder how long can the Cowboys wait in developing their Coach.....
     
  12. CT Dal Fan

    CT Dal Fan Well-Known Member

    1,964 Messages
    2,202 Likes Received
    Not a surprising stat. The Cowboys now define mediocrity. Way, way better than the worst teams in the league; but not talented, smart, or disciplined enough to consistently beat the best teams.

    Which is why we fans get teased by a big win or two per year only to get kicked in the stomach in the end.
     
  13. Idgit

    Idgit That sounds really boring Staff Member

    43,808 Messages
    26,334 Likes Received
    We're not better athletically. We lose to the good teams because we don't slow down good QBs sufficiently to beat them with our own good QB. This is why we've tried to fix the takeaway problem, and tried to improve the secondary. We succeeded at one of those things, but still get carved up by good QBs and beat the teams who don't have them (unless, like the Chiefs, they play outstanding pass defense). We'll beat MIN as a result, and we're going to get throttled by the Saints. And that's going to continue to be the case until the problem isn't just addressed, but it's addressed and solved.

    And, surprise, surprise, this has little to do with play calling, or with OGs, or with variation in the play of Tony Romo.
     
  14. CowboyStar88

    CowboyStar88 Well-Known Member

    9,395 Messages
    5,398 Likes Received
    Not impressed with him as a HC and I solely blame him for ruining Romo's career and turning this fan base on Romo.
     
  15. Bigdog24

    Bigdog24 Well-Known Member

    2,651 Messages
    829 Likes Received
    But everything to do with Game Planning....
     
    cml750 likes this.
  16. jimnabby

    jimnabby Well-Known Member Zone Supporter

    5,769 Messages
    2,797 Likes Received
    Excellent point.

    Here are the numbers, using the Cowboys' opponents' end-of-season records, with the Cowboys games excluded. (For 2013, I'm using current records).

    vs. teams above .500: 7-14
    vs. teams at .500: 0-3 (swept by the 9-7 Giants in 2011, plus the loss to the 4-3 Chargers this year)
    vs. teams below .500: 18-6

    Suddenly, the numbers aren't all that striking.
     
  17. Doomsday

    Doomsday Rising Star

    12,179 Messages
    2,117 Likes Received
    That pretty much sums it up.
     
  18. cml750

    cml750 Well-Known Member

    3,632 Messages
    2,101 Likes Received
    and clock management, and playing to win instead of playing "not to lose", etc.......................
     
  19. CATCH17

    CATCH17 1st Round Pick

    36,804 Messages
    14,257 Likes Received
    Every team gets carved up by great QBs.

    Our conservative play not to lose style costs us more games than anything since Jason hAs been here.

    Last season I can think of maybe 1 game that we actually looked prepared for.

    Washington couldn't even throw a forward pass and they beat us.


    Btw the Saints will not throttle us. The Cowboys play to their opponents level but choke in the end. Plus the Saints aren't much different than us. They just have wayyyy better coaching.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  20. Hoofbite

    Hoofbite Well-Known Member

    34,909 Messages
    4,217 Likes Received
    You could isolate any game from the season and do the same thing.

    7-8 and having won/lost to your team with the difference maker being the game they played against the Broncos. The category they fall into depends on the outcome of that Bronco game.

    7-8 and having won/lost to your team with the difference maker being the game they played against the Jaguars. The category they fall into depends on the outcome of that Jaguar game.

    Also, I don't think the likelihood of getting to .500 or better is increased or decreased by the outcome of your team's games against them any more than it is against any other team. Wins and losses aren't just odds. Teams are either good enough to get to .500 or they aren't.

    Ultimately it is what it is and this would factor in for all teams, including the 27 who have better records than Dallas against teams above .500.
     

Share This Page