Discussion in 'NFL Zone' started by Danny White, Mar 29, 2006.
Wouldn't that just be WAY too funny!
Maybe they'll ask us for Julius Jones, Marcus Spears, and Sean Ryan for him.
That's awesome! If I were Drew Bledsoe I'd call up the Bills front office and laugh in their face, but he may be a bit more forgiving.
Don't forget we in turn got Bledsoe through them too.
:lmao: :lmao2: :laugh2: :hammer: :clap:
The one thing that would make this story perfect is if the Bills get rid of Losman and then sign Quincy Carter to be a veteran backup! The circle of life!
They're just lighting the fire under Losman to see his reaction. Trying to push his buttons, that's all. Craig Nall is to Losman what Chad Hutchinson was to Quincy Carter.
If by that you mean they all stink, sure....
all of them. bad.
Buffalo actually allowed for more sacks with Losman and Holcomb in 2005 than they did with Bledsoe in 2004.
Sure, Bledsoe does have a problem with getting sacked, but it's been clear to me for awhile that they never really had the O-Line that Bledsoe needed and he was hardly the cause for their offensive efficiencies.
It also helps that once you get a good O-Lineman in Jonas Jennings, you don't let the Niners snag him up in FA.
I think they're just testing Losman's mettle with that story.....
mettle shmettle hes garbage
This is absolutely absurd. They're giving up after one measly year?? Even Harrington got a longer audition.
I do agree that they should give Losman some more time. Carson Palmer took a while, and now look at him.
Couldn't happen to a more arrogant, piece of ****, *******...
Its way too early to give up on him, but this typically happens when you just indescriminately throw a QB out there before they are ready. You see things you can't unsee, and you lose perspective.
Thats one reason I hate stats, like someone said, there are lies and then there are stats. Thats plain wrong, since with Holcomb in, they had much less sacks. But Losman had way more sacks, which when combined with Holcomb for 16 games total, you get more sacks than Bledsoe.
So thats completely wrong statement, that Bledsoe was better at not giving up sacks than both of them combined.
Kelly Holcomb was sacked 17 times in 10 games for 230 attempts ( sacked each 13.5 attempts)
While Losman 26 times in 9 Games played in 2005 for 228 attempts (sacked each 8.7 attempts)
While Bledsoe with Buffalo in 2004 was sacked 37 in 16 games for 450 attempts ( Sacked every 12.1 attempts), in 2003 49 times in 471 attempts (Sacked every 9.6 attempts)http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/2359
Anyway you slice it, Holcomb did better than Bledsoe with pretty much same line. Now Losman, obviously sucks and damn stupid decision to get rid of Bledsoe for him.
I tried to warn people, but they didn't listen.....when Bledsoe left Buffalo the curse of the Bledstudsoe began and that franchise will be doomed for years to come.
I just hope a similar fate never afflicts this franchise....let's hope that Drew wins a superbowl and is never cut for some unproven rookie or bust. :bow:
Great, so we haved a cursed QB...I knew it...