"A Giddy Sense of Boosterism"

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by Bach, Nov 17, 2008.

  1. Bach

    Bach Benched

    7,645 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    By Howard Kurtz
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Monday, November 17, 2008; C01

    Perhaps it was the announcement that NBC News is coming out with a DVD titled "Yes We Can: The Barack Obama Story." Or that ABC and USA Today are rushing out a book on the election. Or that HBO has snapped up a documentary on Obama's campaign.

    Perhaps it was the Newsweek commemorative issue -- "Obama's American Dream" -- filled with so many iconic images and such stirring prose that it could have been campaign literature. Or the Time cover depicting Obama as FDR, complete with jaunty cigarette holder.

    Are the media capable of merchandizing the moment, packaging a president-elect for profit? Yes, they are.

    What's troubling here goes beyond the clanging of cash registers. Media outlets have always tried to make a few bucks off the next big thing. The endless campaign is over, and there's nothing wrong with the country pulling together, however briefly, behind its new leader. But we seem to have crossed a cultural line into mythmaking.

    "The Obamas' New Life!" blares People's cover, with a shot of the family. "New home, new friends, new puppy!" Us Weekly goes with a Barack quote: "I Think I'm a Pretty Cool Dad." The Chicago Tribune trumpets that Michelle "is poised to be the new Oprah and the next Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis -- combined!" for the fashion world.

    Whew! Are journalists fostering the notion that Obama is invincible, the leader of what the New York Times dubbed "Generation O"?

    Each writer, each publication, seems to reach for more eye-popping superlatives. "OBAMAISM -- It's a Kind of Religion," says New York magazine. "Those of us too young to have known JFK's Camelot are going to have our own giddy Camelot II to enrapture and entertain us," Kurt Andersen writes. The New York Post has already christened it "BAM-A-LOT."

    "Here we are," writes Salon's Rebecca Traister, "oohing and aahing over what they'll be wearing, and what they'll be eating, what kind of dog they'll be getting, what bedrooms they'll be living in, and what schools they'll be attending. It feels better than good to sniff and snurfle through the Obamas' tastes and habits. . . . Who knew we had in us the capacity to fall for this kind of idealized Americana again?"

    But aren't media people supposed to resist this kind of hyperventilating?

    "Obama is a figure, especially in pop culture, in a way that most new presidents are not," historian Michael Beschloss says. "Young people who may not be interested in the details of NAFTA or foreign policy just think Obama is cool, and they're interested in him. Being cool can really help a new president."

    So can a sense of optimism, reflected on USA Today's front page. "Poll: Hopes soaring for Obama, administration," the headline said, with 65 percent saying "the USA will be better off 4 years from now."

    But what happens when adulation gives way to the messy, incremental process of governing? When Obama has to confront a deep-rooted financial crisis, two wars and a political system whose default setting is gridlock? When he makes decisions that inevitably disappoint some of his boosters?

    "We're celebrating a moment as much as a man, I think," says Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham, whose new issue, out today, compares Obama to Lincoln. "Given our racial history, an hour or two of commemoration seems appropriate. But there is no doubt that the glow of the moment will fade, and I am sure the coverage will reflect that in due course."

    One of the few magazines to strike a skeptical tone is the London-based Economist, which endorsed Obama. "With such a victory come unreasonably great expectations," its lead editorial says.

    Web worship of Obama is nearly limitless. On YouTube alone, the Obama Girl song, "I've Got a Crush on Obama," has been viewed 11.7 million times. Even an unadorned video of the candidate's election night speech in Chicago has drawn 3.5 million views.

    I am not trying to diminish the sheer improbability of what this African American politician, a virtual unknown four years ago, has accomplished. Every one of us views his victory through a personal lens. I thought of growing up in a "Leave It to Beaver" era, when there were no blacks in leading television roles until Bill Cosby was tapped as the co-star of "I Spy" in 1965. When the Watts riots broke out that year, the Los Angeles Times sent an advertising salesman to cover it because the paper had no black reporters. The country has traveled light-years since then.

    It is hard to find a precedent in American history. Ronald Reagan was a marquee star because of his Hollywood career, but mainly among older voters, since he made his last movie 16 years before winning the White House in 1980. Jack Kennedy was a more formal figure after winning the 1960 election -- "trying to look older than he was, because he thought youth was a handicap in running for president," Beschloss says -- but quickly took on larger-than-life dimensions.

    "The Kennedy buildup goes on," James MacGregor Burns wrote in the New Republic in the spring of 1961. "The adjectives tumble over one another. He is not only the handsomest, the best-dressed, the most articulate, and graceful as a gazelle. He is omniscient; he swallows and digests whole books in minutes; he confounds experts with his superior knowledge of their field. He is omnipotent."

    Soon afterward, Kennedy blundered into the Bay of Pigs debacle.

    The media would be remiss if they didn't reflect the sense of unadulterated joy that greeted Obama's election, both here and around the world, and the pride even among those who opposed him. Newspapers were stunned and delighted at the voracious demand for post-election editions, prompting The Washington Post and other papers to print hundreds of thousands of extra copies and pocket the change. (When else have we felt so loved lately?) Demand for inaugural tickets has been unprecedented. Barack is suddenly a hot baby name. Record companies are releasing hip-hop songs, by the likes of Jay-Z and Will.I.Am, with such titles as "Pop Champagne for Barack." Consumers, the Los Angeles Times reports, are buying up "Obama-themed T-shirts, buttons, bobblehead dolls, coffee mugs, wine bottles, magnets, greeting cards, neon signs, mobile phones and framed art prints."

    A barrage of Obama-related books are in the works. Newsweek's quadrennial election volume is titled "A Long Time Coming: The Historic, Combative, Expensive and Inspiring 2008 Election and the Victory of Barack Obama." Publishers obviously see a bull market.

    MSNBC, which was accused of cheerleading for the Democratic nominee during the campaign, is running promos that say: "Barack Obama, America's 44th president. Watch as a leader renews America's promise." What are viewers to make of that?

    There is always a level of excitement when a new president is coming to town -- new aides to profile, new policies to dissect, new family members to follow. But can anyone imagine this kind of media frenzy if John McCain had managed to win?

    Obama's days of walking on water won't last indefinitely. His chroniclers will need a new story line. And sometime after Jan. 20, they will wade back into reality.

  2. Maikeru-sama

    Maikeru-sama Mick Green 58

    14,547 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I personally think people are out of their minds if they don't think the Media, both Cable and Mainstream won't rip Barack Obama if he starts mishandling the United States.

    I think Barack Obama is going to be one of the most scrutinized presidents in quite some time.

    The media is having a field day mainly because Bush is so unpopular and Barack Obama did just accomplish something that has never been done in the United States.

    George W. Bush had this same goodwill after 9-11 and he totally squandered it.

    As a matter of fact, you were called a traitor if you didn't get with the Bush Program during the months following 9-11.

    Bill O'Reilly is always bragging about Fox News' rating and all the viewers he has, so I am sure many will be notified if Barack Obama start to do a horrible job.

    Oh, God forbid people actually get excited about their President again.
  3. Bach

    Bach Benched

    7,645 Messages
    0 Likes Received

    80%+ of the media didn't vote for Bush like they did for Obama. Sure GWB got the patriotic goodwill his way after 9/11, but the media was just waiting for anything to nail him on.
    With Obama, it's the opposite. He'll get the benefit of the doubt from the media cheerleaders as long as possible.

    The only way the media would be critical or turn on him is if he totally falters and public opinion is solidly against him. If that doesn't happen then the media will be chanting and cheering the next four years.

    Like the article said, you'd never see anything like this if McCain had won. It's not about just being excited about a new President. It's about being all giddy that their guy won.
  4. Hostile

    Hostile Persona Non Grata Zone Supporter

    119,427 Messages
    3,700 Likes Received
    I think the expectations are so high for Obama that he cannot possibly reach them. I am not saying that is a bad thing. It is wonderful to have that much faith placed in you. I just worry about the ripple effect if he fails to live up to the standards being placed on him.
  5. iceberg

    iceberg winter??? RUN AWAY RUN AWAY!!! Zone Supporter

    29,687 Messages
    2,583 Likes Received
    this is what i was saying before the election when it was pretty obvious obama was more popular than pet rocks, mood rings or bell bottoms.

    is he "pop culture"? if so he's going to be in trouble because those come and go and never had any intention of staying around. however, i don't think he's pop culture in the sense of those listed above, but i *do* feel that a lot of people put their hope and "money" into obama because he was going to make it all better.

    you don't get called "the messiah" (right or wrong) if people don't have or think you should have high expectations placed upon you. however, are those expectations realistic?

    given we list in a "must have it now" society of microwaves, fast food and wars that must be over quickly, do we have the endurance to see this through?

    the biggest problem i see isn't whether or not obama will do a good job. the biggest problem he will face is one of his own creation. promised more than he could ever deliver and his reality won't live up to the hype of the promise.
  6. iceberg

    iceberg winter??? RUN AWAY RUN AWAY!!! Zone Supporter

    29,687 Messages
    2,583 Likes Received
    this is the cliff notes version of what i've been saying. :)
  7. DaBoys4Life

    DaBoys4Life Benched

    15,621 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    when people are calling him a savior and messiah and trying to make a holiday for him before he even steps into office I think they need to re think a lot of things.
  8. Maikeru-sama

    Maikeru-sama Mick Green 58

    14,547 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    Of course you wouldn't see the same giddy media if McCain had won because many associated him with George W. Bush, unfairly, but many made that association.

    Also, this issue Bach is presenting is not that he is a Rock Star but that the Media won't criticize the guy if he runs this country into the ground.

    That is an incredibly stupid argument.

    Barack Obama is in a honeymoon period now but if he starts to run this country into the ground, his own party and the media will turn on quicker than a New York minute.

    But it is what it is...sour grapes.
  9. iceberg

    iceberg winter??? RUN AWAY RUN AWAY!!! Zone Supporter

    29,687 Messages
    2,583 Likes Received
    i don't think too many on obamas side were doing the messiah thing. however, trying to make a holiday? this new? i heard things about it but not sure where it came from.

    hope can be a wonderful thing or it can be a killer. bush had hope/momentum on his side too and it changed quickly. because of lies or being wrong?

    doesn't seem to matter. it changed. obama has set himself up to be "all that" and the people bought it in massive fashion. i hope he is. i hope he can be.

    but i don't think any president can live up to the expectations he's either set for himself or "the people" have set for him.
  10. Hostile

    Hostile Persona Non Grata Zone Supporter

    119,427 Messages
    3,700 Likes Received
    They very well could, and I am saying it might not be deserved when it happens. They are giving him very little margin for error. I think the Right will come after him like never before and that may be what saves him to a degree. People will see it as vengeance for the Sarah Palin vetting, Joe the Plumber, or whatever.

    The guy is my President and he has my full support. He also has my sympathy because I think ti will be hard to sleep with all the wolves howling at the door.
  11. Bach

    Bach Benched

    7,645 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    That's not true at all. No where did I say they wouldn't criticize him if he ran the country into the ground. Read it yourself:

    The only way the media would be critical or turn on him is if he totally falters and public opinion is solidly against him.

    It is a fact that the media members voted for him and cheered him on the entire way. It will take him running it into the ground before they will actually criticize him, which is unlike what they do when there's someone in there they don't want. Then they nitpick and try to find things to harp on and complain about. Whereas now, Obama will get a free pass unless it all starts to fall apart.
  12. burmafrd

    burmafrd Well-Known Member

    43,609 Messages
    3,061 Likes Received
    Maikeru you are ignoring how much in love so much of the media is with Obama. He will get slack no one has ever gotten. He will get less criticism then anyone has. And if you think other wise then you are really out to lunch.

Share This Page