1. Welcome to CowboysZone!  Join us!  Come on!  You know you want to!

Sharon Stone loses Dior gig for being an idiot

Discussion in 'Political Zone' started by joseephuss, May 29, 2008.

  1. joseephuss

    joseephuss Well-Known Member

    21,232 Messages
    1,172 Likes Received
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/business/worldbusiness/30dior.html?hp

    Dior Drops Actress for China Remark

    By DAVID JOLLY
    Published: May 30, 2008

    PARIS — Christian Dior, the French fashion brand, has become the latest global company to learn a hard lesson about the danger of offending Chinese sensitivities.

    Facing the possibility of a boycott of its products, the luxury company said Thursday that it had dropped the American actress Sharon Stone from its advertising in China after she suggested last week that the recent earthquakes in Sichuan Province were karmic retribution for Beijing’s treatment of Tibet.

    “They had no choice” but to drop her from China, said Tom Bernardin, the chairman and chief executive of the advertising agency Leo Burnett Worldwide. “Obviously, she crossed the line.”

    With the Beijing Olympic Games a few months away, and growth slowing in developed countries, luxury companies have been pouring resources into China.

    “What comes through in this is the importance of the Chinese market to foreign brands,” Mr. Bernardin said. “Being successful in China, like anywhere else, means being sensitive to local conditions.”

    Despite efforts to keep attention on their affairs, overseas companies have found that politics has a way of creeping into business in unexpected ways in China.

    In April, the French retailer Carrefour was the focus of protests after disturbances at the Olympic torch relay in Paris, when pro-Tibetan demonstrators lunged at a Chinese torch-bearer in a wheelchair. That image, quickly available on video-sharing Web sites, set off calls for a boycott of the company. Tempers calmed, but only after the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, dispatched an aide to soothe relations.

    In 2005, Japanese businesses across China were singled out for boycotts and demonstrations after Japan sought to introduce textbooks into junior high school that played down its militarism in World War II.

    Both Google and Yahoo, the two leading Internet search engine companies, have agreed to cooperate with the Chinese authorities in censoring the Web in order to maintain their access to the market.

    The gaffe by Ms. Stone, which also provoked a call for boycotts of films in which she appears, brought sharp criticism from the media. Xinhua, the state-run Chinese news agency, referred to Ms. Stone in an editorial Thursday as “the public enemy of all mankind.”

    A spokesman for Dior in Paris, who asked not to be identified because of company policy, said that Dior’s office in Shanghai had issued a statement Thursday in which it announced that it would stop using Ms. Stone in its advertising in China. The statement recognized that the comments had been “hurtful.”

    According to the spokesman in Paris, “We also said we shared the pain of the Chinese people and earthquake victims in Sichuan.”

    Ms. Stone also apologized in a statement released by Dior, in which ” and that she would “wholly devote” herself to helping earthquake victims.

    Ms. Stone said last week during an interview at the Cannes Film Festival: “I’m not happy about the way the Chinese are treating the Tibetans because I don’t think anyone should be unkind to anyone else. And then the earthquake and all this stuff happened, and then I thought, is that karma? When you’re not nice that the bad things happen to you?”

    The blow-up also serves as a reminder that companies, having hired celebrities to promote their wares, could end up with little control over their image if the star should stray.

    “Celebrities are real people; they have opinions,” said Graham Hales, of the Interbrand consulting firm in London. When Ms. Stone spoke at Cannes, “she was talking as Sharon Stone, not the direct representative of the brand,” he added.

    Celebrities are “enormously difficult to manage,” Mr. Hales said, and companies “need to carefully consider whether celebrities really work for their brands.”
  2. Doomsday101

    Doomsday101 Well-Known Member

    77,095 Messages
    2,876 Likes Received
    I understand people being upset with what is taking place in Tibet but her karmic retribution statement was just stupid.

Share This Page