TO or LT?

Discussion in 'NFL Zone' started by MarionBarberThe4th, Aug 20, 2010.

  1. MarionBarberThe4th

    MarionBarberThe4th Well-Known Member

    13,637 Messages
    1,557 Likes Received
    Terrell Owens or Ladainian Tomlinson, whos the better player historically?
  2. ThreeSportStar80

    ThreeSportStar80 Benched

    27,093 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I'm going with T.O... Say what you want but he's put up amazing numbers.
  3. theogt

    theogt Surrealist Zone Supporter

    45,816 Messages
    5,733 Likes Received
  4. urface59

    urface59 Active Member

    1,512 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    LT had 5 seasons of a 4.0 or better YPC. T.O has had 9 seasons of over 1,000 receiving yards. I think T.O has been the better player but LT was the heart of his team for a long time and is thus more valuable.
  5. rkell87

    rkell87 Well-Known Member

    7,753 Messages
    345 Likes Received
    TO, as productive for a longer period of time= better
  6. hornitosmonster

    hornitosmonster Well-Known Member

    7,870 Messages
    2,647 Likes Received
    T.O. for the more productive career
  7. jswalker1981

    jswalker1981 Fact > Your Opinion

    2,616 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    TO has 1006 receptions for 14951 yards, and 144 TDs, over 14 years.

    LT has 12490 yards rush, 530 receptions, 3955 yards receiving for 16445 total yards, and 153 TDs, over 9 seasons.

    So, LT has 1,545 more total yards and 9 more total TDs than TO with 5 less seasons.

    And just to look at season averages:

    TO averaged 71.85 receptions, 1067.92 receiving yards, and 10.28 TDs a season.
    LT averaged 320 carries, 58.88 receptions, 1827.22 total yards, and 17 TDs a season.

    TO had pro bowl QBs throwing to him. And before someone goes off and says that TO made the QBs "Pro Bowl QBs", here is the breakdown of total pro bowls of QBs that played with and without TO.

    Steve Young: 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998
    Jeff Garcia: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007
    Donnovan McNabb: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2009
    Tony Romo: 2006, 2007, 2009

    Between those 4 QBs, there are 20 pro bowls. TO was on their team for 9 of those seasons (bold faced).

    I'll take LT over TO.
  8. Hostile

    Hostile The Duke

    119,480 Messages
    4,173 Likes Received
    LT in a walkaway. He's a 1st ballot HOFer, no doubt.
  9. urface59

    urface59 Active Member

    1,512 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    They were both one of the greatest, but not THE greatest, players at their position of all time.
  10. johnny utah

    johnny utah Guest

  11. big dog cowboy

    big dog cowboy THE BIG DOG Staff Member

    67,269 Messages
    22,509 Likes Received
    Pretty amazing stats.

    The greatness of LT seems to have escaped some posters memory.
  12. Ntegrase96

    Ntegrase96 Well-Known Member

    5,821 Messages
    5,055 Likes Received

    yup. It's a 'what have you done for me lately?' type world we live in. But to put it in perspective a bit, last year was not a good year by LT's standards. STILL, he only had one less TD than all three of our RBs combined.

    His 2006 season inflates his stats quite a bit... or perhaps just balances out the average seasons he's had the past two years (albeit injury plagued years, and 2008 was only average by his standards). Still, 2006 was probably the greatest performance of any single player in a regular season.

    But yeah. This is a very legitimate debate. Hard for me to choose, so I'd have to throw T.O.'s issues into the mix. I'll take the good ol' texas guy.
  13. 1fisher

    1fisher Well-Known Member

    5,777 Messages
    120 Likes Received

    LT > TO ..... and no where near the headache!
  14. BraveHeartFan

    BraveHeartFan We got a hat. I want a ring.

    27,458 Messages
    3,974 Likes Received
    As TO would be, and should be, if the HOF was actually about what a player did on the field and not rather the media personally liked them or not.

    Say what you want about TO off the field and how selfish he can be, I wouldn't defend him against any of those as they're well deserved complaints, but being in the Hall of Fame is about what a player did on the football field.

    In the history of the game, by the time TO retires, there will be only 1, or 2, WR's ahead of him in every major statistical catagory for his position.

    That's not just good, that's not just great, that's Hall of Fame worthy.

    I like me some LT though as well so I think they're both great but I'll take TO in the long haul.
  15. mldardy

    mldardy Well-Known Member

    9,560 Messages
    2,770 Likes Received
    I guess I can give a slight edge to TO. Because he has shown to be more of a difference maker especially in big games where Tomlinson is hurt sitting on the sidelines with his visor helmet on. Also I wish would stop calling Tomlinson 'LT'. There is only one LT and it isn't Tomlinson.
  16. Hagman

    Hagman Put Niland and Green in the ROH

    1,274 Messages
    20 Likes Received
    He's the all-time NFL leader in categories like quarterbacks thrown under the bus, locker rooms divided, and hissy fits thrown. He's way ahead of LT there.
  17. Tricericon

    Tricericon Member

    874 Messages
    6 Likes Received
    I feel that Owens has had the slightly better career. They'll both be HOFers, probably both on the first ballot. I never did like either one of 'em tho.

Share This Page