Why don't we...

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by K-Mart, Dec 7, 2005.

  1. K-Mart

    K-Mart Member

    287 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    run the 2 tackle formation that SD does with Columbo replacing a TE. We could put him next to one of the tackles. We could potentially have LA, Tucker, and Columbo lined up next to each other with Cambell in the backfield as a blocker. They hurt us and others with that formation. It would of helped on 3rd and 1 last week. Thoughts?
  2. AbeBeta

    AbeBeta Well-Known Member

    28,566 Messages
    3,118 Likes Received
    Yes, our problem has been putting too few OL on the field.
  3. StevenOtero

    StevenOtero Well-Known Member

    6,692 Messages
    874 Likes Received
    Yeah, Thomas formation works pretty good. Our HS uses it a lot. Dallas on the other hand needs all the help they can get. It sure wouldn't hurt us more.
  4. JBRockBottom31

    JBRockBottom31 Member

    427 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I was thinking the same thing this morning.
  5. AbeBeta

    AbeBeta Well-Known Member

    28,566 Messages
    3,118 Likes Received
    Lookit. You guys are going to confuse Parcells.

    First you want us to "open it up" -- then you want a very conservative approach with an extra OL.

    How do you expect BP to learn anything from visiting here if we can't be consistent?
  6. Nors

    Nors Benched

    22,015 Messages
    1 Likes Received
    Lets go sign Tham
  7. Hostile

    Hostile The Duke

    119,480 Messages
    4,173 Likes Received
    In the PC today Parcells basically said there are no plans to use Columbo much at all at this point.

    Maybe it's time we stop finding ways to get him in the starting lineup?

Share This Page